Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 121 - 140 of 970
CASE OF BĂRBULESCU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF B RBULESCU v. ROMANIA 61496/08 DOMOKOS HANCU E. JUVERDEANU O. ROU 9/5/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for private life Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD006149608https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177082
CASE OF BĂRBULESCU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF B RBULESCU v. ROMANIA 61496/08 COSTINESCU D. JUVERDEANU O. ROU 1/12/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD006149608https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159906
CASE OF BABIARZ v. POLAND
CASE OF BABIARZ v. POLAND 1955/10 OSAK W. POL 1/10/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits Article 35 3 Ratione materiae No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110JUD000195510https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170344
CASE OF BANNIKOVA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BANNIKOVA v. RUSSIA 18757/06 SOLNECHNAYA S. V. RUS 11/4/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 445 76 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1104JUD001875706 FIRST SECTION CASE OF BANNIKOVA v. RUSSIA Application no. 18757/06 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 4 November 2010 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1104JUD001875706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101589
CASE OF BENITEZ MORIANA AND IÑIGO FERNANDEZ v. SPAIN
CASE OF BENITEZ MORIANA AND I IGO FERNANDEZ v. SPAIN 36537/15 36539/15 ARANDA IGLESIAS B. ESP 3/9/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression 149 148 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD003653715 THIRD ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD003653715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208412
CASE OF BODROZIC v. SERBIA
CASE OF BODROZIC v. SERBIA 32550/05 LIPOVAN V. SRB 6/23/2009 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage award Articles 92 93 and 96 of the Criminal Code Article 39 of the General Criminal Code Articles 160 162 419 420 425 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623JUD003255005https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-93159
CASE OF BOTTA v. ITALY
CASE OF BOTTA v. ITALY 21439/93 N/A ITA 2/24/1998 12:00:00 AM Art. 8 inapplicable Art. 14 inapplicable Law no. 13 of 9 January 1989 sections 1 2 10 and 11 Law no. 104 of 5 February 1992 sections 23 3 41 8 and 42 451 429 343 100 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0224JUD002143993https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58140
CASE OF BOUJLIFA v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOUJLIFA v. FRANCE 25404/94 N/A FRA 10/21/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 concerning the conditions of entry and residence of aliens in France as modified by Laws no. 80 9 of 10 January 1980 no. 81 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1021JUD002540494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58106
CASE OF BOZHKOV v. BULGARIA
CASE OF BOZHKOV v. BULGARIA 3316/04 GROZEV Y. BGR 4/19/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Articles 78a 147 and 148 1 3 and 2 of the Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0419JUD000331604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-104541
CASE OF BRUMARESCU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF BRUMARESCU v. ROMANIA 28342/95 N/A ROU 10/28/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 by reason of lack of fair hearing Violation of Art. 6 1 by reason of refusal of right of access to court Violation of P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved Decree no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1028JUD002834295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58337
CASE OF C.R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF C.R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 20190/92 N/A GBR 11/22/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 1 Sexual Offences Amendment Act 1976 section 1 1 a Court of Appeal Criminal Division R. v. R. judgment of 14 March 1991 1991 2 All England Law Reports 257 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD002019092https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57955
CASE OF CENTRUM FÖR RÄTTVISA v. SWEDEN
CASE OF CENTRUM F R R TTVISA v. SWEDEN 35252/08 BERGMAN F. SWE 6/19/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619JUD003525208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183863
CASE OF CENTRUM FÖR RÄTTVISA v. SWEDEN
CASE OF CENTRUM F R R TTVISA v. SWEDEN 35252/08 BERMAN F. EVANS A. SWE 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD003525208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210078
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22414/93 N/A GBR 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002241493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58004
CASE OF COLAK v. GERMANY
CASE OF COLAK v. GERMANY 9999/82 DEU 12/6/1988 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 445 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1206JUD000999982 In the Colak case Note by the Registrar: The case is numbered 15/1987/138/192. The second figure indicates the year in which the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1206JUD000999982https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57461
CASE OF CONNORS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CONNORS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66746/01 N/A GBR 5/27/2004 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 No separate issue under P1 1 No separate issue under Art. 6 No violation of Art. 6 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0527JUD006674601https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61795
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 57325/00 LORD LESTER OF HERNE HILL QC GOLDSTON J. STRUPEK D. CZE 11/13/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 14 P1 2 General measures refused ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113JUD005732500https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83256
CASE OF DALIA v. FRANCE
CASE OF DALIA v. FRANCE 26102/95 N/A FRA 2/19/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 3 Public Health Code Article L. 630 1 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD002610295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58130
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM 19983/92 N/A BEL 2/24/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0224JUD001998392https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58015
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY 43395/09 CONTICCHIO D. ITA 2/23/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement Violation of Article 6 Right ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0223JUD004339509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-171804