Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6221 - 6240 of 7304
M.R. i V. v. Spain
M.R. i V. v. Spain CRPD/C/26/D/48/2018 Communication number s : 48/2018 Author: M.R. i V. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 26 Country Spain Submission date 17 Nov 2015 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/26/D/48/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3060/en-US
M.S.H. v. Sweden
M.S.H. v. Sweden CAT/C/35/D/235/2003 Communication number s : 235/2003 Author: M.S.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Sep 2003 Date of decision 14 Nov 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/35/D/235/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/124/en-US
M.S.P.-B. v. Netherlands
M.S.P. B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/123/D/2673/2015 Communication number s : 2673/2015 Author: M.S.P. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 Jun 2013 Date of decision 25 Jul 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2673/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2540/en-US
M.S. (represented by counsel, Ms. Line Bøgsted) v. Denmark
M.S. represented by counsel Ms. Line B gsted v. Denmark CAT/C/55/D/571/2013 Communication number s : 571/2013 Author: M.S. represented by counsel Ms. Line B gsted Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 55 Country Denmark Submission date 22 JUTBCAT/C/55/D/571/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1957/en-US
M.V. v. Netherlands
M.V. v. Netherlands CAT/C/30/D/201/2002 Communication number s : 201/2002 Author: M.V. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Netherlands Submission date 31 Jan 2002 Date of decision 02 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/201/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/169/en-US
M.W. v. Denmark v. Denmark
M.W. v. Denmark v. Denmark CEDAW/C/63/D/46/2012 Communication number s : 046/2012 Author: M.W. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Denmark Submission date 21 Aug 2012 Date of decision 22 Feb 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/63/D/46/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2098/en-US
M. X. v. Belarus,Switzerland,Ukraine
M. X. v. Belarus Switzerland Ukraine CAT/C/40/D/311/2007 Communication number s : 311/2007 Author: M. X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 40 Country Belarus Switzerland Ukraine Submission date 19 Jan 2007 Date of decision 07 May 2008 JUTBCAT/C/40/D/311/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/81/en-US
M.Y. v. Sweden
M.Y. v. Sweden CRPD/C/24/D/49/2018 Communication number s : 49/2018 Author: M.Y. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 24 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Mar 2018 Date of decision 19 Mar 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/24/D/49/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3070/en-US
M.Z.A. v. Azerbaijan,Sweden
M.Z.A. v. Azerbaijan Sweden CAT/C/48/D/424/2010 Communication number s : 424/2010 Author: M.Z.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Azerbaijan Sweden Submission date 03 Jun 2010 Date of decision 22 May 2012 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/48/D/424/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/29/en-US
M.Z.B.M. v. Denmark
M.Z.B.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2593/2015 Communication number s : 2593/2015 Author: M.Z.B.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 31 Mar 2015 Date of decision 20 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2593/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2240/en-US
MAJEWSKI v. Poland
MAJEWSKI v. Poland POL 11/01/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20588
MAKSIM SAVOV v. Bulgaria
MAKSIM SAVOV v. Bulgaria BGR 13/01/2021 00:00:00 09/03/2021 15:06:29 Case Description: The case concerns the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons provided in 2010 by the courts when assessing if the applicant presented a risk of absconding or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56819
MALI: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
MALI: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/MLI/CO/2 NULL 2014 04 30T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/MLI/CO/2 International Convention on the Distr.: General 1 May 2014 Protection of the Rights of English All Migrant Workers and Original: French Members of UHRICMW/C/MLI/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f67eb47b-3937-4206-9108-18f3b4247908
MALI: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
MALI: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/MLI/CO/1 NULL 2018 11 06T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/MLI/CO/1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 6 November 2018 English Original: French Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/MLI/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c4dad02e-b508-4736-9c8a-38c9794696e7
MAMMADOV (JALALOGLU) v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADOV JALALOGLU v. Azerbaijan AZE 11/04/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These groups of cases concern mainly the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants next of kin or their ill treatment allegedly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1759
MARESTI v. Croatia
MARESTI v. Croatia HRV 25/09/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice/ Ne bis in idem: The applicant had been prosecuted and tried twice for the same offence before the Minor Offences Court and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10101
MARINIC v. Croatia
MARINIC v. Croatia HRV 02/09/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Delayed enforcement of a final judgment against the State in the applicants favour without assessing their ability to repay the State the amount at EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58333
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 17/03/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These groups of cases concern mainly the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants next of kin or their ill treatment allegedly imputable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1711
MIKHAYLOVA v. Ukraine
MIKHAYLOVA v. Ukraine UKR 08/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: These cases concern principally the issue of procedural guarantees in administrative responsibility proceedings. In Mikhaylova the applicant was not afforded adequate time EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49719
MILJEVIC v. Croatia
MILJEVIC v. Croatia HRV 25/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants freedom of expression due to convictions imposed in 2009 2012 for defamation Article 200 of the Criminal Code EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56053