Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 81 - 100 of 8860
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017 Communication number s : 3041/2017 Author: B.D.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 07 Nov 2017 Date of decision 19 Mar 2019 Comment: Individual opinion of Jos JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2916/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi CAT/C/71/D/858/2018 Communication number s : 858/2018 Author: B.N. and S.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Burundi Submission date 22 Dec 2017 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/858/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3375/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BEG S.P.A. v. Italy
BEG S.P.A. v. Italy ITA 20/08/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: This case concerns the unfairness of voluntary arbitration proceedings which ended in 2002 due to the lack of impartiality of an arbitrator top official and counsel of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58315
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 12/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal to consider the merits of the applicants claims and appeals due to a restrictive interpretation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6072
BENIN: OPSC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BENIN: OPSC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/OPSC/BEN/CO/1 NULL 2018 11 28T00:00:00 CRC OP SC United Nations CRC/C/OPSC/BEN/CO/1 Convention on the Distr.: General 29 November 2018 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child UHRICRC/C/OPSC/BEN/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0d10ca8b-eccb-42b2-a52d-7ee993060803
BERANEK v. the Czech Republic
BERANEK v. the Czech Republic CZE 05/10/2017 00:00:00 09/10/2017 10:54:50 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to erroneous dismissal of the applicant s constitutional appeal following the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47887
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 27/06/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:01:47 Case Description: This case concerns the restrictions imposed in 2005 2013 on the right to travel abroad on account of the authorities refusal to issue travel passports after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49913
BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: The case concerns certain shortcomings in the secret surveillance regime including bulk interception and obtaining communications data from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57685
BUDINOVA AND CHAPRAZOV v. Bulgaria
BUDINOVA AND CHAPRAZOV v. Bulgaria BGR 16/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: These cases concern the failure of domestic courts to discharge a positive obligation to afford redress to persons of Jewish and Roma origin for anti Semitic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57681
BURAK HUN v. Turkey
BURAK HUN v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in convictions for crimes committed upon active incitement by undercover state agents. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37092
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US