Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 101 - 120 of 8430
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/710/2015 Communication number s : 710/2015 Author: Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim represented by counsel Mr. Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date JUTBCAT/C/62/D/710/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2405/en-US
Arellano Medina v. Ecuador
Arellano Medina v. Ecuador E/C.12/63/D/7/2015 Communication number s : 007/2015 Author: Jaime Efra n Arellano Medina Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 63 Country Ecuador Submission date 24 Apr 2015 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/63/D/7/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2408/en-US
Arredondo v. Peru
Arredondo v. Peru CCPR/C/69/D/688/1996 Communication number s : 688/1996 Author: Ms. Carolina Teillier Arredondo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Peru Submission date 17 Nov 1995 Date of decision 27 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/688/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/882/en-US
Asensi Martínez v. Paraguay
Asensi Mart nez v. Paraguay CCPR/C/95/D/1407/2005 Communication number s : 1407/2005 Author: Juan Asensi Mart nez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Paraguay Submission date 26 Apr 2005 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1407/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1492/en-US
Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye
Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US
Aung v. Canada
Aung v. Canada CAT/C/36/D/273/2005 Communication number s : 273/2005 Author: Thu Aung Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 36 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jul 2005 Date of decision 15 May 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/36/D/273/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/117/en-US
Ayas v. Sweden
Ayas v. Sweden CAT/C/21/D/97/1997 Communication number s : 097/1997 Author: Orhan Ayas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Sweden Submission date 12 Nov 1997 Date of decision 12 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/97/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/255/en-US
Aytulun and Guclu v. Sweden,Türkiye
Aytulun and Guclu v. Sweden T rkiye CAT/C/45/D/373/2009 Communication number s : 373/2009 Author: Munir Aytulun and Lilav Guclu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Sweden T rkiye Submission date 27 Jan 2009 Date of decision 19 Nov JUTBCAT/C/45/D/373/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/61/en-US
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
B.M. v. Sweden
B.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/28/D/179/2001 Communication number s : 179/2001 Author: B.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 28 Country Sweden Submission date 23 Mar 2001 Date of decision 30 Apr 2002 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/28/D/179/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/183/en-US
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden CAT/C/64/D/641/2014 Communication number s : 641/2014 Author: B.N.T.K. represented by counsel Mai Greitz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/64/D/641/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2456/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BHR/CO/1 NULL 2018 11 15T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BHR/CO/1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 15 November 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BHR/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ef2bcb58-bc2d-4a70-8a0f-59a393dcf797
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2018 04 18T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BGD/CO/1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 18 April 2018 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/94146787-dedc-4ee2-8cd7-9d205c6878a1
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/BLR/CO/5 6 NULL 2020 02 28T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/BLR/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 28 February 2020 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/BLR/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/fd0e9cbb-f832-4537-ae30-885fd8b44dd8