Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 241 - 260 of 433
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) TURKEY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention TURKEY TUR a15 a22 a25 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal PRT 2013 03 21 2013 07 09 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI in accordance with its ECRIPRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Latvia
Government comments on the third report on Latvia LVA 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Latvia ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRILVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENG
H.W.A.. v. Switzerland
H.W.A.. v. Switzerland CAT/C/20/D/48/1996 Communication number s : 048/1996 Author: H.W.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 20 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Apr 1996 Date of decision 20 May 1998 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/20/D/48/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/244/en-US
Haraldsson and Sveinsson v. Iceland
Haraldsson and Sveinsson v. Iceland CCPR/C/91/D/1306/2004 Communication number s : 1306/2004 Author: Erlingur Sveinn Haraldsson and rn Sn var Sveinsson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Iceland Submission date 15 Sep 2003 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1306/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1375/en-US
I. S. v. Belarus
I. S. v. Belarus CCPR/C/101/D/1994/2010 Communication number s : 1994/2010 Author: I. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 101 Country Belarus Submission date 14 Dec 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1994/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1638/en-US
Independent Expert on minority issues
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/23/Add.2 from 19 September 2007 to 28 September 2007 4 March 2008 Independent Expert on minority issues France UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/7/23/Add.2 4 March 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL UNSPA/HRC/7/23/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f23%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Interim follow-up Conclusions on Latvia - 5th monitoring cycle
Interim follow up Conclusions on Latvia 5th monitoring cycle LVA 2021 06 29 2021 10 05 CRI 2021 26 ECRI CONCLUSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN RESPECT OF LATVIA SUBJECT TO INTERIM FOLLOW UP Adopted on 29 June 2021 1 Published on 5 ECRILAT-IFU-V-2021-26-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LAT-IFU-V-2021-26-ENG
Interim follow-up Conclusions on Turkey - 4th monitoring cycle
Interim follow up Conclusions on Turkey 4th monitoring cycle TUR 2013 12 05 2014 02 25 CRI 2014 6 ECRI CONCLUSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN RESPECT OF TURKEY SUBJECT TO INTERIM FOLLOW UP Adopted on 5 December 2013 1 ECRI Secretariat ECRITUR-IFU-IV-2014-006-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-IFU-IV-2014-006-ENG
J.A.B.S. v. Costa Rica
J.A.B.S. v. Costa Rica CRC/C/74/D/5/2016 Communication number s : 005/2016 Author: J.A.B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Costa Rica Submission date 19 Sep 2015 Date of decision 17 Jan 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/74/D/5/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2172/en-US
J.D.P. and K.E.P. v. Sweden
J.D.P. and K.E.P. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2743/2016 Communication number s : 2743/2016 Author: J.D.P. and K.E.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2743/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2846/en-US
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
J.M. v. Spain
J.M. v. Spain CRPD/C/23/D/37/2016 Communication number s : 37/2016 Author: J.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country Spain Submission date 18 Mar 2016 Date of decision 21 Aug 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/37/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3075/en-US
Jérémie Ebénézer Ngapna et al. v. Cameroon
J r mie Eb n zer Ngapna et al. v. Cameroon CCPR/C/126/D/2035/2011 Communication number s : 2035/2011 Author: J r mie Eb n zer Ngapna et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Cameroon Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2035/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2785/en-US
K.N. v. France
K.N. v. France CAT/C/23/D/93/1997 Communication number s : 093/1997 Author: K.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country France Submission date 15 Aug 1997 Date of decision 18 Nov 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/23/D/93/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/222/en-US
Käkkäläjärvi et al. v. Finland
K kk l j rvi et al. v. Finland CCPR/C/124/D/2950/2017 Communication number s : 2950/2017 Author: Klemetti K kk l j rvi et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Finland Submission date 23 Mar 2016 Date of decision 02 Nov 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2950/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3322/en-US
Kell v. Canada
Kell v. Canada CEDAW/C/51/D/19/2008 Communication number s : 019/2008 Author: Cecilia Kell Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jun 2008 Date of decision 28 Feb 2012 Comment: The text of one individual JUTBCEDAW/C/51/D/19/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1718/en-US
Khaleel v. Maldives
Khaleel v. Maldives CCPR/C/123/D/2785/2016 Communication number s : 2785/2016 Author: Ahmed Khaleel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Maldives Submission date 11 Jul 2016 Date of decision 27 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2785/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3324/en-US