Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 701 - 712 of 712
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (Follow-up visit)
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/39 16 July 2019 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Follow up visit Hungary United Nations A/HRC/42/39 General Assembly Distr.: General 16 July 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty second session 9 27 September 2019 UNSPA/HRC/42/39https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f39&Lang=en
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
Report to HRC A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 from 27 June 2014 to 30 June 2014 10 September 2018 Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Montenegro United Nations A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 September 2018 English only Human UNSPA/HRC/39/46/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f39%2f46%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X, Y and Z v. Sweden
X Y and Z v. Sweden CAT/C/55/D/530/2012 Communication number s : 530/2012 Author: X Y and Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Nov 2012 Date of decision 04 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/55/D/530/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2073/en-US
X v. Australia
X v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/789/2016 Communication number s : 789/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 21 Oct 2016 Date of decision 27 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/789/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3356/en-US
Yury Orkin v. Russian Federation
Yury Orkin v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/126/D/2410/2014 Communication number s : 2410/2014 Author: Yury Orkin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Russian Federation Submission date 16 Dec 2013 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2410/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2781/en-US
Z.P. v. Canada
Z.P. v. Canada CCPR/C/41/D/341/1988 Communication number s : 341/1988 Author: Z.P. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 41 Country Canada Submission date 12 Apr 1988 Date of decision 11 Apr 1991 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/41/D/341/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/454/en-US
Zeynalov v. Estonia
Zeynalov v. Estonia CCPR/C/115/D/2040/2011 Communication number s : 2040/2011 Author: Akhliman Avyaz Ogly Zeynalov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Estonia Submission date 28 Sep 2009 Date of decision 04 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2040/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2082/en-US
de León Castro v. Spain
de Le n Castro v. Spain CCPR/C/95/D/1388/2005 Communication number s : 1388/2005 Author: Jos Luis de Le n Castro Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Spain Submission date 23 Aug 2004 Date of decision 19 Mar 2009 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1388/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1016/en-US
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato (UNADIS) v. Italy, Complaint No. 147/2017
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato UNADIS v. Italy Complaint No. 147/2017 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 01 04 000 04 01 000 04 04 000 05 00 000 06 04 000 24 00 163 91 00 163 2021 06 30 2021 11 10 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-147-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-147-2017-dmerits-en
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
v. Jamaica
v. Jamaica CCPR/C/50/D/353/1989 Communication number s : 353/1989 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Jamaica Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCCPR/C/50/D/353/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1780/en-US