Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7681 - 7700 of 7731
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.1 from 16 April 2018 to 23 April 2018 2 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chad United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination (Visit to EU institutions)
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.4 from 25 April 2016 to 28 April 2016 11 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Visit to EU institutions UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X.Q.L. v. Australia
X.Q.L. v. Australia CAT/C/52/D/455/2011 Communication number s : 455/2011 Author: X.Q.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 52 Country Australia Submission date 03 Mar 2011 Date of decision 02 May 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/52/D/455/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1828/en-US
X.Y. v. Switzerland
X.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/26/D/128/1999 Communication number s : 128/1999 Author: X.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 26 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Mar 1999 Date of decision 15 May 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/26/D/128/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/196/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/75/D/1081/2021 Communication number s : 1081/2021 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Jun 2021 Date of decision 11 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1081/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3613/en-US
X v. Australia,Lebanon
X v. Australia Lebanon CAT/C/42/D/324/2007 Communication number s : 324/2007 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Australia Lebanon Submission date 02 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Apr 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/42/D/324/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/69/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CAT/C/67/D/791/2016 Communication number s : 791/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Sergei Voronov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/791/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2678/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014 Communication number s : 2366/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 19 Mar 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2017/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
X v. Norway
X v. Norway CCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014 Communication number s : 2474/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Norway Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2018/en-US
X v. United Republic of Tanzania
X v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/18/D/22/2014 Communication number s : 022/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 23 Jun 2014 Date of decision 18 Aug 2017 Comment: JUTBCRPD/C/18/D/22/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2390/en-US
Y.G. v. Switzerland
Y.G. v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/822/2017 Communication number s : 822/2017 Author: Y.G. represented by counsel Urs Ebn ther Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 22 Apr 2017 Date of decision 26 Nov 2018 JUTBCAT/C/65/D/822/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2595/en-US
Y.M. v. Russian Federation
Y.M. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011 Communication number s : 2059/2011 Author: Y.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Jul 2010 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2113/en-US
Y.Z. v. Belarus
Y.Z. v. Belarus CCPR/C/118/D/2135/2012 Communication number s : 2135/2012 Author: Y.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country Belarus Submission date 01 Dec 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2135/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2166/en-US
Y. v. Canada,Sri Lanka
Y. v. Canada Sri Lanka CCPR/C/114/D/2280/2013 Communication number s : 2280/2013 Author: Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Canada Sri Lanka Submission date 29 Jul 2013 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2280/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1995/en-US
Y v. United Republic of Tanzania
Y v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/20/D/23/2014 Communication number s : 023/2014 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 23 Jun 2014 Date of decision 31 Aug 2018 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/20/D/23/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2511/en-US
YESILGOZ v. Turkey
YESILGOZ v. Turkey TUR 27/09/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to criminal convictions of members of the executive committee of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5540
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/09/2012 00:00:00 16/10/2018 15:10:36 Case Description: This group of cases concerns interferences with the applicants right to respect for their home or their private and family life as a result of eviction or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1924