Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 104
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
A.R.I. v. Denmark
A.R.I. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/72/D/96/2015 Communication number s : 096/2015 Author: A.R.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Sep 2015 Date of decision 25 Feb 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/96/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2652/en-US
Anderson v. Australia
Anderson v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005 Communication number s : 1367/2005 Author: Tim Anderson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 26 Jul 2004 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1306/en-US
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo-Japalali v. Philippines
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo Japalali v. Philippines CCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015 Communication number s : 2536/2015 Author: Hadji Hamid Japalali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Philippines Submission date 01 Sep 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2569/en-US
CASE OF J. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF J. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 58216/12 Weiss A. AUT 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 4 Prohibition of slavery and forced labour Article 4 Positive obligations Article 4 1 Trafficking in human beings No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD005821612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170388
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS 47708/08 ZEGVELD L. EIKELBOOM A.W. NLD 11/20/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 38 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148367
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA 36376/04 IOFFE M.L. LVA 5/17/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 Article 14 and Chapter IX of the 1926 Criminal Code of Soviet Russia Article 68 3 of the 1961 Criminal Code 288 536 291 434 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98669
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 N/A TUR 2/6/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 as regard the extradition proceedings No separate issue under Art. 6 as regard the other complaints Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60924
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
Concluding observations on the ninth periodic report of Norway
Concluding observations on the ninth periodic report of Norway CEDAW/C/NOR/CO/9 NULL 2017 11 22T00:00:00 CEDAW Concluding observations on the ninth periodic report of Norway 1.The Committee considered the ninth periodic report of Norway CEDAW/C/NOR/9 at UHRICEDAW/C/NOR/CO/9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6aa79824-df74-4e3d-8e05-014bffeea667
Cuartero Casado v. Spain
Cuartero Casado v. Spain CCPR/C/84/D/1399/2005 Communication number s : 1399/2005 Author: Luis Cuartero Casado Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Spain Submission date 18 Nov 2004 Date of decision 25 Jul 2005 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1399/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1169/en-US
Dumont v. Canada
Dumont v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1467/2006 Communication number s : 1467/2006 Author: Michel Dumont Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 17 Mar 2006 Date of decision 16 Mar 2010 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1467/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1582/en-US
Fatima Mehalli v. Algeria
Fatima Mehalli v. Algeria CCPR/C/110/D/1900/2009 Communication number s : 1900/2009 Author: Fatima Mehalli represented by counsel the Collectif des familles de disparu e s en Alg rie Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Algeria JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1900/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1807/en-US
Hom v. Philippines
Hom v. Philippines CCPR/C/78/D/1169/2003 Communication number s : 1169/2003 Author: Antonio Hom Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Philippines Submission date 20 Dec 2001 Date of decision 30 Jul 2003 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1169/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1075/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of India, Finland, and the Philippines
AFTERNOON 27 March 2023 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of India Finland and the Philippines. The Council adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of India. The Vice President said 221 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-india-finland-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review of Sweden, Grenada, Turkey and Kuwait
Human Rights CouncilMORNING/MIDDAY 26 June 2015 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Sweden Grenada Turkey and Kuwait.At the beginning of the meeting the President of the Council Joachim Ruecker UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2015/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-sweden
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review of Togo, Syria and Venezuela
Human Rights Council MORNING 16 March 2017The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Togo Syria and Venezuela. Kokouvi Agbetomey Minister for Justice and Relations with the Institutions of Togo thanked the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-togo-syria
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US