Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US
Cridge v. Canada
Cridge v. Canada CCPR/C/95/D/1529/2006 Communication number s : 1529/2006 Author: Josephine Lovey Cridge Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 95 Country Canada Submission date 01 Jun 2006 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1529/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1479/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
Joslin et al. v. New Zealand
Joslin et al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/75/D/902/1999 Communication number s : 902/1999 Author: Juliet Joslin Jennifer Rowan Margaret Pearl and Lindsay Zelf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country New Zealand Submission date 30 Nov 1998 JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/902/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/995/en-US
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway CERD/C/67/D/30/2003 Communication number s : 030/2003 Author: The Jewish community of Oslo the Jewish community of Trondheim Rolf Kirchner Julius Paltiel the Norwegian Antiracist Centre and Nadeem Butt Type of JUTBCERD/C/67/D/30/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1740/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014 Communication number s : 2366/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 19 Mar 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2017/en-US