Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 143
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy CCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019 Communication number s : 3587/2019 Author: A.Y.O.AQ Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Italy Submission date 02 May 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3145/en-US
Ali Aarrass v. Spain
Ali Aarrass v. Spain CCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010 Communication number s : 2008/2010 Author: Ali Aarrass Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Spain Submission date 25 Nov 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1860/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal CCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009 Communication number s : 1863/2009 Author: Dev Bahadur Maharjan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Dec 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1238/en-US
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS 47708/08 ZEGVELD L. EIKELBOOM A.W. NLD 11/20/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 38 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148367
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA 36376/04 IOFFE M.L. LVA 5/17/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 Article 14 and Chapter IX of the 1926 Criminal Code of Soviet Russia Article 68 3 of the 1961 Criminal Code 288 536 291 434 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98669
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2312/08 34179/08 LOZO A. MEHIC I. BIH 7/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Heavier penalty Retroactivity Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122716
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
Conclusions XXII-1 - Poland - Article 1-2
Conclusions XXII 1 Poland Article 1 2 POL 01 02 000 29/01/2021 02/02/2021 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 2 Freely undertaken work non discrimination prohibition of forced labour other aspects The Committee takes note of the information contained in the ESCXXII-1/def/POL/1/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XXII-1/def/POL/1/2/EN
Engo v. Cameroon
Engo v. Cameroon CCPR/C/96/D/1397/2005 Communication number s : 1397/2005 Author: Pierre D sir Engo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Cameroon Submission date 30 Mar 2005 Date of decision 22 Jul 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1397/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1527/en-US
Eugénie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Eug nie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016 Communication number s : 2835/2016 Author: Eug nie Chakupewa et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3232/en-US
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review of Togo, Syria and Venezuela
Human Rights Council MORNING 16 March 2017The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Togo Syria and Venezuela. Kokouvi Agbetomey Minister for Justice and Relations with the Institutions of Togo thanked the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-togo-syria
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
India’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 1 May 2017 India s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Thursday 4 May 2017 in a meeting that will be webcast live. India is one of the 14 States to UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/05/indias-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Lula da Silva v. Brazil
Lula da Silva v. Brazil CCPR/C/134/D/2841/2016 INITIAL PROCEEDINGS Communication number s : 2841/2016 Author: Luiz In cio Lula da Silva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Brazil Submission date 28 Jul 2016 Date of decision 17 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2841/2016 (INITIAL PROCEEDINGS)https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3115/en-US
Múnera López et al v. Colombia
M nera L pez et al v. Colombia CCPR/C/128/D/3076/2017 Communication number s : 3076/2017 Author: Isabel L pez Mart nez Gladys Cecilia Rinc n de M nera Nad n Jos M nera Rinc n Adolfo M nera Rinc n Gladys Cristina M nera Rinc n Mar a Camila M nera Cepeda JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3076/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2820/en-US
Maya Nepal v. Nepal
Maya Nepal v. Nepal CCPR/C/132/D/2615/2015 Communication number s : 2615/2015 Author: Devi Maya Nepal Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Nepal Submission date 24 Mar 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2615/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3187/en-US