Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12
CASE OF ILHAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF ILHAN v. TURKEY 22277/93 N/A TUR 6/27/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed victim Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion No violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage financial award Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0627JUD002227793https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58734
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL 56080/13 S FERNANDES R. PRT 12/19/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 21825/93 23414/94 N/A GBR 6/9/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 445 7 310 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002182593https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58175
Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Australia
Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Australia CCPR/C/AUS/CO/6 NULL 2017 12 01T00:00:00 CCPR Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Australia 1.The Committee considered the sixth periodic report of Australia UHRICCPR/C/AUS/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c09dc287-c4db-460e-ae7d-c645bf1f350a
E.S. v. Australia
E.S. v. Australia CAT/C/59/D/652/2015 Communication number s : 652/2015 Author: E.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Australia Submission date 19 Jan 2015 Date of decision 06 Dec 2016 Comment: Views non violation Substantive JUTBCAT/C/59/D/652/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2213/en-US
F.J. et al. v. Australia
F.J. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013 Communication number s : 2233/2013 Author: F.J. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 03 Dec 2012 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3092/en-US
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
M.K.M. v. Australia
M.K.M. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/681/2015 Communication number s : 681/2015 Author: M.K.M. represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 18 May 2015 Date of decision 10 May 2017 JUTBCAT/C/60/D/681/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2253/en-US
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012 Communication number s : 2136/2012 Author: M.M.M. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision Comment: The text of an individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1674/en-US
S.T. v. Australia
S.T. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/716/2015 Communication number s : 716/2015 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 23 Oct 2015 Date of decision 11 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/716/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3463/en-US
Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders
Report to HRC A/HRC/37/51/Add.3 from 4 October 2016 to 18 October 2016 28 February 2018 Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders Australia United Nations A/HRC/37/51/Add.3 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 October 2018 Original: UNSPA/HRC/37/51/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f37%2f51%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia CAT/C/68/D/855/2017 Communication number s : 855/2017 Author: Susith Wasitha Ranawaka represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Australia Submission date 20 Nov JUTBCAT/C/68/D/855/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2699/en-US