Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4041 - 4060 of 4231
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2004/94/Add.1 from 19 May 2003 to 27 May 2003 12 March 2004 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders Thailand UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2004/94/Add.1 12 March UNSPE/CN.4/2004/94/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2004%2f94%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 from 10 October 2004 to 21 October 2004 16 March 2005 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders T rkiye UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 UNSPE/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2005%2f101%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2003/104/Add.2 from 26 May 2002 to 1 June 2002 6 December 2002 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders Guatemala E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2003/104/Add.2 6 UNSPE/CN.4/2003/104/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2003%2f104%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Stewart v. Canada
Stewart v. Canada CCPR/C/58/D/538/1993 Communication number s : 538/1993 Author: Charles E. Stewart Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Canada Submission date 18 Feb 1993 Date of decision 01 Nov 1996 Comment: Five individual JUTBCCPR/C/58/D/538/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/551/en-US
Surat Huseynov v. Azerbaijan
Surat Huseynov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/111/D/2042/2011 Communication number s : 2042/2011 Author: Surat Davud Oglu Huseynov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 111 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 05 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2042/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1865/en-US
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia CAT/C/68/D/855/2017 Communication number s : 855/2017 Author: Susith Wasitha Ranawaka represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Australia Submission date 20 Nov JUTBCAT/C/68/D/855/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2699/en-US
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009 Communication number s : 1910/2009 Author: Svetlana Zhuk Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Oct 2009 Date of decision 30 Oct 2013 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1689/en-US
Sylvie Bakatu-Bia v. Sweden
Sylvie Bakatu Bia v. Sweden CAT/C/46/D/379/2009 Communication number s : 379/2009 Author: Sylvie Bakatu Bia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 03 Jun 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/46/D/379/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1792/en-US
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.E.A. v. Spain
T.E.A. v. Spain CRC/C/89/D/50/2018 Communication number s : 50/2018 Author: T.E.A. Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 89 Country Spain Submission date 03 Aug 2018 Date of decision 08 Feb 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/89/D/50/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3003/en-US
T. H. v. Spain
T. H. v. Spain E/C.12/66/D/28/2018 Communication number s : 028/2018 Author: T. H. Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 66 Country Spain Submission date 09 Apr 2018 Date of decision 11 Oct 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBE/C.12/66/D/28/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2613/en-US
T. M. v. Republic of Korea
T. M. v. Republic of Korea CAT/C/53/D/519/2012 Communication number s : 519/2012 Author: T. M. represented by counsel Jae Chang Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 24 Apr 2012 Date of decision 21 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/519/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2059/en-US
T.N. v. Denmark
T.N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012 Communication number s : 037/2012 Author: T.N. represented by counsel Tyge Trier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Sep 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1880/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.S. v. Russian Federation
T.S. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014 Communication number s : 69/2014 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3448/en-US
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011 Communication number s : 2044/2011 Author: T.V. and A.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Feb 2009 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2101/en-US
TOGO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TOGO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/TGO/CO/3 NULL 2019 08 27T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/TGO/CO/3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 27 August 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: French or Punishment UHRICAT/C/TGO/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8bf13a16-5379-44c2-a9d1-6c8e9ed5bb6e
TOGO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TOGO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/TGO/CO/5 NULL 2021 08 24T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/TGO/CO/5 International Covenant on Distr.: General 24 August 2021 Civil and Political Rights English Original: French Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/TGO/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/75b7c750-395f-4c0d-9a46-1f60d79c973f
TONELLO v. Hungary
TONELLO v. Hungary HUN 24/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49455
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592