Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1341 - 1360 of 1453
Gurbanova and Muradhasilova v. Azerbaijan
Gurbanova and Muradhasilova v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/131/D/2952/2017 Communication number s : 2952/2017 Author: Matanat Baliyar Gizi Gurbanova and Saadat Baliyar Gizi Muradhasilova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Azerbaijan JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2952/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3249/en-US
H.H. v. Austria
H.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/46/D/427/1990 Communication number s : 427/1990 Author: H.H. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 46 Country Austria Submission date 20 Sep 1990 Date of decision 22 Oct 1992 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/427/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/413/en-US
H.L. v. Australia
H.L. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/754/2016 Communication number s : 754/2016 Author: H.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/754/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3358/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Saint Lucia, Oman and Austria
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 7 June 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Saint Lucia Oman and Austria.Donatus Keith St. Aimee Permanent Representative of Saint Lucia to the United Nations UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-saint-lucia
Human Rights Council holds Annual thematic discussion on sharing best practices and promoting technical cooperation
Human Rights Council MIDDAY 21 March 2012 Discussion Focuses on Paving the Way towards the Second Cycle of the Universal Periodic Review The Human Rights Council during its midday meeting today held its annual thematic discussion on sharing of best UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-holds-annual-thematic-discussion-sharing-best-practices
Human Rights Council holds Panel discussion on Nelson Mandela International Day
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 21 September 2012 Concludes General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms and on the Universal Periodic Review The Human Rights Council this afternoon held a panel discussion on Nelson Mandela International Day after UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-holds-panel-discussion-nelson-mandela-international-day
I.U.K. et al. v. Denmark
I.U.K. et al. v. Denmark CAT/C/63/D/703/2015 Communication number s : 703/2015 Author: I.U.K. et al. represented by counsel Jytte Lindg rd Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Oct 2015 Date of decision 17 JUTBCAT/C/63/D/703/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2746/en-US
Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/43/Add.2 from 22 January 2015 to 30 January 2015 11 August 2015 Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons Austria United Nations A/HRC/30/43/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 11 August 2015 UNSPA/HRC/30/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/103 from 31 October 1998 to 13 November 1998 18 February 1999 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia Somalia UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/103 18 February 1999 UNSPE/CN.4/1999/103https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f103&Lang=en
Interim follow-up Conclusions on Austria - 4th monitoring cycle
Interim follow up Conclusions on Austria 4th monitoring cycle AUT 2012 12 04 2013 02 19 CRI 2013 4 ECRI CONCLUSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN RESPECT OF AUSTRIA SUBJECT TO INTERIM FOLLOW UP Adopted on 4 December 2012 1 ECRI ECRIAUT-IFU-IV-2013-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AUT-IFU-IV-2013-004-ENG
Interim follow-up Conclusions on Austria - 6th monitoring cycle
Interim follow up Conclusions on Austria 6th monitoring cycle AUT 2022 06 29 2022 09 20 CRI 2022 30 ECRI CONCLUSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN RESPECT OF AUSTRIA SUBJECT TO INTERIM FOLLOW UP Adopted on 29 June 2022 1 Published on 20 ECRIAUT-IFU-V-2022-30-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AUT-IFU-V-2022-30-ENG
Irschik v. Austria
Irschik v. Austria CCPR/C/80/D/990/2001 Communication number s : 990/2001 Author: Arthur Irschik Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Austria Submission date 12 Dec 2000 Date of decision 19 Mar 2004 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/990/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1093/en-US
Jenny v. Austria
Jenny v. Austria CCPR/C/93/D/1437/2005 Communication number s : 1437/2005 Author: Wolfgang Jenny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Austria Submission date 08 Aug 2005 Date of decision 09 Jul 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1437/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1408/en-US
K.H. v. Denmark
K.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/123/D/2423/2014 Communication number s : 2423/2014 Author: K.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Apr 2014 Date of decision 16 Jul 2018 Comment: Individual opinion of Committee JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2423/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2498/en-US
KLEIN v. Austria
KLEIN v. Austria AUT 03/06/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of property: Deprivation of a lawyer who had lost the right to practice as a result of bankruptcy proceedings and a criminal conviction of all entitlements to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-961
Karakurt v. Austria
Karakurt v. Austria CCPR/C/74/D/965/2000 Communication number s : 965/2000 Author: M mtaz Karakurt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Austria Submission date 13 Dec 2000 Date of decision 04 Apr 2002 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/965/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/966/en-US
Kollar v. Austria
Kollar v. Austria CCPR/C/78/D/989/2001 Communication number s : 989/2001 Author: Walter Kollar Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Austria Submission date 06 Dec 2000 Date of decision 30 Jul 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/989/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1081/en-US
Krausser v. Austria
Krausser v. Austria CCPR/C/76/D/890/1999 Communication number s : 890/1999 Author: Emmerich Krausser Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Austria Submission date 27 Sep 1999 Date of decision 23 Oct 2002 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/890/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/350/en-US
Lederbauer v. Austria
Lederbauer v. Austria CCPR/C/90/D/1454/2006 Communication number s : 1454/2006 Author: Wolfgang Lederbauer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Austria Submission date 27 Sep 2005 Date of decision 13 Jul 2007 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1454/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1385/en-US
Lopez Burgos v. Uruguay
Lopez Burgos v. Uruguay CCPR/C/13/D/52/1979 Communication number s : 052/1979 Author: Delia Saldias de Lopez alleged victim s wife Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 13 Country Uruguay Submission date 06 Jun 1979 Date of decision 29 Jul 1981 JUTBCCPR/C/13/D/52/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/298/en-US