Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1361 - 1380 of 1453
M. Köck v. Austria
M. K ck v. Austria CRPD/C/26/D/50/2018 Communication number s : 50/2018 Author: M. K ck Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 26 Country Austria Submission date 07 Jul 2017 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/26/D/50/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3056/en-US
M.N. v. Denmark
M.N. v. Denmark CCPR/C/132/D/3188/2018 Communication number s : 3188/2018 Author: M.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Denmark Submission date 22 May 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3188/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3182/en-US
M.R. and L.J. v. Austria
M.R. and L.J. v. Austria CCPR/C/134/D/2965/2017 Communication number s : 2965/2017 Author: M.R. and L.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Austria Submission date 27 Feb 2017 Date of decision 25 Mar 2022 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2965/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3757/en-US
M.W. v. Denmark v. Denmark
M.W. v. Denmark v. Denmark CEDAW/C/63/D/46/2012 Communication number s : 046/2012 Author: M.W. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Denmark Submission date 21 Aug 2012 Date of decision 22 Feb 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/63/D/46/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2098/en-US
MOSER v. Austria
MOSER v. Austria AUT 21/12/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to transfer of custody of a child to the Youth Welfare Office EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1033
Mahabir v. Austria
Mahabir v. Austria CCPR/C/82/D/944/2000 Communication number s : 944/2000 Author: Chanderballi Mahabir Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 82 Country Austria Submission date 18 May 1999 Date of decision 26 Oct 2004 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/944/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1142/en-US
Malik v. Czech Republic
Malik v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/64/D/669/1995 Communication number s : 669/1995 Author: Gerhard Malik Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Czech Republic Submission date 06 Sep 1995 Date of decision 21 Oct 1998 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/64/D/669/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/784/en-US
OSTERREICHISCHE VEREINIGUNG ZUR ERHALTUNG, STARKUNG UND SCHAFFUNG... v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHE VEREINIGUNG ZUR ERHALTUNG STARKUNG UND SCHAFFUNG... v. Austria AUT 28/02/2014 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the insufficiently reasoned refusal by a regional authority EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-493
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria AUT 07/03/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation under Section 111 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with section 33 of Media Act and prohibition to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1055
P.A. v. Netherlands
P.A. v. Netherlands CAT/C/57/D/611/2014 Communication number s : 611/2014 Author: P.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 Jun 2014 Date of decision 02 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/57/D/611/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2117/en-US
Paraga v. Croatia
Paraga v. Croatia CCPR/C/71/D/727/1996 Communication number s : 727/1996 Author: Dobroslav Paraga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Croatia Submission date 16 Apr 1996 Date of decision 04 Apr 2001 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/71/D/727/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/913/en-US
Pauger (2) v. Austria
Pauger 2 v. Austria CCPR/C/65/D/716/1996 Communication number s : 716/1996 Author: Dietmar Pauger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Austria Submission date 22 Jan 1996 Date of decision 25 Mar 1999 Comment: See also the author s JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/716/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/771/en-US
Perterer v. Austria
Perterer v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1015/2001 Communication number s : 1015/2001 Author: Paul Perterer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 31 Jul 2001 Date of decision 20 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1015/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1124/en-US
Pohl et al. v. Austria
Pohl et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1160/2003 Communication number s : 1160/2003 Author: Godfried and Ingrid Pohl Wolfgang Mayer Franz Wallmann Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 23 Sep 2002 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1160/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1114/en-US
Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 117)
Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 117 117 Strasbourg 1984 11 22T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Strasbourg 1988 11 01T00:00:00 7 COEETS No. 117https://rm.coe.int/168007a082
Protocol to the European Convention on the Equivalence of Diplomas leading to Admission to Universities (ETS No. 049)
Protocol to the European Convention on the Equivalence of Diplomas leading to Admission to Universities ETS No. 049 049 Strasbourg 1964 06 03T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States Parties to Treaty ETS 15 and for accession by the non COEETS No. 049https://rm.coe.int/168006ff4b
R.S. v. Austria
R.S. v. Austria CAT/C/28/D/111/1998 Communication number s : 111/1998 Author: R.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 28 Country Austria Submission date 16 Apr 1997 Date of decision 30 Apr 2002 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/28/D/111/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/180/en-US
RAMBAUSKE v. Austria
RAMBAUSKE v. Austria AUT 28/04/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Excessive length of civil and criminal administrative proceedings and lack of effective remedy thereof Status of Execution: The Austrian administrative court system has EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1109
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT IN THE FIELD OF CULTURAL RIGHTS, FARIDA SHAHEED : ADDENDUM : MISSION TO AUSTRIA
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT IN THE FIELD OF CULTURAL RIGHTS FARIDA SHAHEED : ADDENDUM : MISSION TO AUSTRIA A/HRC/20/26/Add.1 NULL 2012 04 10T00:00:00 SR Cultural rights United Nations A/HRC/20/26/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 April 2012 UHRIA/HRC/20/26/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0cd329f7-bd1c-439f-93b5-1db655833279
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT IN THE FIELD OF CULTURAL RIGHTS, FARIDA SHAHEED : ADDENDUM, PRELIMINARY NOTE ON THE MISSION TO AUSTRIA
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT IN THE FIELD OF CULTURAL RIGHTS FARIDA SHAHEED : ADDENDUM PRELIMINARY NOTE ON THE MISSION TO AUSTRIA A/HRC/17/38/Add.2 NULL 2011 05 16T00:00:00 SR Cultural rights United Nations A/HRC/17/38/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: UHRIA/HRC/17/38/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6391a290-a3d7-4fa0-9400-71142d9d3206