Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 221
A.A. v. Canada
A.A. v. Canada CCPR/C/103/D/1819/2008 Communication number s : 1819/2008 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 103 Country Canada Submission date 23 Sep 2008 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1819/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1626/en-US
A.D. v. Cyprus
A.D. v. Cyprus CAT/C/75/D/1065/2021 Communication number s : 1065/2021 Author: A.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Cyprus Submission date 18 Mar 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1065/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3610/en-US
A/HRC/47/10: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Nepal
United Nations A/HRC/47/10 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/10https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4710-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-nepal
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017 Communication number s : 3041/2017 Author: B.D.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 07 Nov 2017 Date of decision 19 Mar 2019 Comment: Individual opinion of Jos JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2916/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN 68519/10 LINDBERG C. O. SWE 4/3/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iraq 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN Application ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142085
CASE OF AKHLYUSTIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF AKHLYUSTIN v. RUSSIA 21200/05 SPERANSKIY O. RUS 11/7/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1107JUD002120005https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178342
CASE OF ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN 68762/14 71200/14 REMEZAITE R. JAVADOV J. AZE 9/20/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD006876214https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186126
CASE OF ALPEYEVA AND DZHALAGONIYA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ALPEYEVA AND DZHALAGONIYA v. RUSSIA 7549/09 33330/11 ALPEYEVA L.T. VINOGRADOV A. RUS 6/12/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612JUD000754909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183537
CASE OF ANDANDONSKIY v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ANDANDONSKIY v. RUSSIA 24015/02 MOYSHINA T.S. RUS 9/28/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 240 264 286 and 301 445 76 122 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0928JUD002401502 THIRD SECTION CASE OF ANDANDONSKIY v. RUSSIA ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0928JUD002401502https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77054
CASE OF AOULMI v. FRANCE [Extracts]
CASE OF AOULMI v. FRANCE Extracts 50278/99 DEBRAY J. FRA 1/17/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 8 Failure to comply with obligations under Art. 34 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0117JUD005027899https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72055
CASE OF APOSTU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF APOSTU v. ROMANIA 22765/12 MATEUT G. ROU 2/3/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0203JUD002276512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-150781
CASE OF AREFYEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF AREFYEV v. RUSSIA 29464/03 SHKRYUBA R. RUS 11/4/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 1 c 350 448 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1104JUD002946403 FIRST SECTION CASE OF AREFYEV v. RUSSIA Application no. 29464/03 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 4 November ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1104JUD002946403https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101596
CASE OF AYETULLAH AY v. TURKEY
CASE OF AYETULLAH AY v. TURKEY 29084/07 1191/08 CO KUN S. TUR 10/27/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 6 3 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Adversarial trial Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1027JUD002908407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205373
CASE OF BĂRBULESCU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF B RBULESCU v. ROMANIA 61496/08 DOMOKOS HANCU E. JUVERDEANU O. ROU 9/5/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for private life Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD006149608https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177082
CASE OF BAŞ v. TURKEY
CASE OF BA v. TURKEY 66448/17 BENLAHCEN A. TUR 3/3/2020 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303JUD006644817https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201761
CASE OF BATIASHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF BATIASHVILI v. GEORGIA 8284/07 BARATASHVILI I. GEO 10/10/2019 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1010JUD000828407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-196374
CASE OF BENET CZECH, SPOL. S R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF BENET CZECH SPOL. S R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 31555/05 KLIMES P. CZE 10/21/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 Article 79a of the Code of Criminal Procedure 14 128 369 62 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1021JUD003155505 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BENET CZECH ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1021JUD003155505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101202
CASE OF BENET PRAHA, SPOL. S R.O., v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF BENET PRAHA SPOL. S R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 33908/04 7937/05 25249/05 29402/05 33571/06 KLIMES P. CZE 2/24/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0224JUD003390804https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-103625