Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2301 - 2320 of 2872
Means of restraint in psychiatric establishments for adults
Means of restraint in psychiatric establishments for adults fep fmfh fmmfx fmmk fmmr fmmt ftm ftp 2017 03 21 2017 03 21 European Committee for the Prevention of Tortureand Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT Strasbourg 21 March 2017 CPT/Inf CPTCPT/Inf(2017)6https://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2017-6-en
Mikhail Krasnov v. Kyrgyzstan
Mikhail Krasnov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/101/D/1402/2005 Communication number s : 1402/2005 Author: Tatyana Krasnova represented by counsel Independent Human Rights Group Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1402/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2110/en-US
Munaf v. Iraq,Romania
Munaf v. Iraq Romania CCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006 Communication number s : 1539/2006 Author: Mohammad Munaf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Iraq Romania Submission date 13 Dec 2006 Date of decision 30 Jul 2009 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1517/en-US
NATUNEN v. Finland
NATUNEN v. Finland FIN 30/06/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the applicant s defence due to the destruction by the authorities EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4882
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
NITULESCU v. Romania
NITULESCU v. Romania ROU 22/12/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction by the High Court of Cassation and Justice for influence peddling mainly on the basis of audio taped EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13349
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
OYAL v. Turkey
OYAL v. Turkey TUR 23/06/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Right to life / functioning of justice / protection of private life / effective remedy: Failure of authorities to protect the lives of the applicants or their next of kin on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37334
Ondracka v. Czech Republic
Ondracka v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/91/D/1533/2006 Communication number s : 1533/2006 Author: Zdenek and Milada Ondracka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Apr 2006 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1533/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1374/en-US
PILAGS v. Latvia
PILAGS v. Latvia LVA 03/03/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: The present case concerns a breach of the right to a fair trial as the domestic courts did not properly examine the applicant s allegations of incitement in the administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59813
Palandjian and Palandjian v. Hungary
Palandjian and Palandjian v. Hungary CCPR/C/80/D/1106/2002 Communication number s : 1106/2002 Author: Rebecca Palandjian and Aghabab Palandjian Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Hungary Submission date 21 Jun 1999 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1106/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1052/en-US
Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies, EVALUATION REPORT, NORTH MACEDONIA
Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA MKD 2019 03 22 2019 06 27 Adoption: 22 March 2019 Publication: 27 June 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)7-Final-eng-NorthMacedonia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)7-Final-eng-NorthMacedonia-PUBLIC
Protocol No. 3 to the European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities concerning Euroregional Co-operation Groupings (ECGs) (CETS No. 206)
Protocol No. 3 to the European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities concerning Euroregional Co operation Groupings ECGs CETS No. 206 206 Utrecht 2009 11 16T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by COECETS No. 206https://rm.coe.int/1680084827
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (ETS No. 046)
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto ETS No. 046 046 Strasbourg 1963 09 COEETS No. 046https://rm.coe.int/168006b65c
Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 117)
Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 117 117 Strasbourg 1984 11 22T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Strasbourg 1988 11 01T00:00:00 7 COEETS No. 117https://rm.coe.int/168007a082
Public statement concerning the Chechen Republic of the Russian Federation
Public statement concerning the Chechen Republic of the Russian Federation RUS RUSNCR fcb fep fmmd 13/03/2007 13/03/2007 CPT/Inf 2007 17 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT Public statement CPTCPT/Inf (2007) 17https://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-rus-2007decl-en
Public statement on the Russian Federation concerning the Chechen Republic and other republics of the North Caucasian region
Public statement on the Russian Federation concerning the Chechen Republic and other republics of the North Caucasian region RUS RUSNCR fcb fep fmmd 2019 03 11 2019 03 11 CPT/Inf 2019 6 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or CPTCPT/Inf (2019) 6https://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-rus-2019decl-en