Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4581 - 4600 of 5180
MEHEMI v. France
MEHEMI v. France FRA 26/09/1997 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Final banning order against an Algerian national with strong bonds with France and no links with Algeria which would result in his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32977
MEIMANIS v. Latvia
MEIMANIS v. Latvia LVA 21/10/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Interference due to interception of telephone conversations without the ex post facto judicial approval for the interception of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12694
MENCKEBERG v. the Netherlands
MENCKEBERG v. the Netherlands NLD 22/02/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Appeal Court resulting in the applicant s conviction to a four months prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4451
MENGESHA KIMFE v. Switzerland
MENGESHA KIMFE v. Switzerland CHE 29/10/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unnecessary interference due to the authorities refusal for five years to assign asylum seekers to the same canton as their spouses so EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4740
MIKHEYEV v. Russia
MIKHEYEV v. Russia RUS 26/04/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns deaths torture or inhuman and degrading treatment while in police custody in various regions of Russia in 1998 2017 and the lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14082
MILADINOV AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
MILADINOV AND OTHERS v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 46398/09 50570/09 50576/09 GODZO D. GODZO A. MKD 4/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 3 Reasonableness of pre trial detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD004639809https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142521
MURADYAN v. Armenia
MURADYAN v. Armenia ARM 24/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligation to protect the applicants sons right to life during their military service as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46287
Madafferi v. Australia
Madafferi v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001 Communication number s : 1011/2001 Author: Francesco Madafferi and Anna Maria Immacolata Madafferi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2001 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1123/en-US
Mahuika et al. v. New Zealand
Mahuika et al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/70/D/547/1993 Communication number s : 547/1993 Author: Apirana Mahuika et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 70 Country New Zealand Submission date 10 Dec 1992 Date of decision 27 Oct 2000 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/547/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/897/en-US
Maksudov, Rakhimov, Tashbaev and Pirmatov v. Kyrgyzstan,Uzbekistan
Maksudov Rakhimov Tashbaev and Pirmatov v. Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan CCPR/C/93/D/1461 1462 1476 1477/2006 Communication number s : 1476/2006 1462/2006 1477/2006 1461/2006 Author: Zhakhongir Maksudov and Adil Rakhimov Yakub Tashbaev and Rasuldzhon Pirmatov JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1461,1462,1476&1477/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1445/en-US
Mikhail Krasnov v. Kyrgyzstan
Mikhail Krasnov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/101/D/1402/2005 Communication number s : 1402/2005 Author: Tatyana Krasnova represented by counsel Independent Human Rights Group Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1402/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2110/en-US
Munaf v. Iraq,Romania
Munaf v. Iraq Romania CCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006 Communication number s : 1539/2006 Author: Mohammad Munaf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Iraq Romania Submission date 13 Dec 2006 Date of decision 30 Jul 2009 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1517/en-US
NASSR ALLAH v. Latvia
NASSR ALLAH v. Latvia LVA 21/10/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:38 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of appeal proceedings against the first instance court decisions concerning detention in application of the Immigration EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31216
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
Novakovic v. Serbia
Novakovic v. Serbia CCPR/C/100/D/1556/2007 Communication number s : 1556/2007 Author: Marija and Dragana Novakovic Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Serbia Submission date 10 Nov 2006 Date of decision 21 Oct 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1556/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1533/en-US
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
PETUKHOVA v. Russia
PETUKHOVA v. Russia RUS 02/08/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The applicant a resident of Moscow was allegedly suffering from a mental disorder and in August 2006 a court authorised her involuntary psychiatric examination. However the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13994