Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5161 - 5180 of 5180
Third report on Malta
Third report on Malta MLT 2007 12 14 2008 04 29 CRI 2008 22 Council of Europe European Commission against Racism and Intolerance Third report on Malta Adopted on 14 December 2007 Strasbourg 29 April 2008 Table of contents ECRIMLT-CbC-III-2008-022-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-CbC-III-2008-022-ENG
Third report on Portugal
Third report on Portugal PRT 2006 06 30 2007 02 13 CRI 2007 4 Council of Europe European Commission against Racism and Intolerance Third report on Portugal Adopted on 30 June 2006 Strasbourg 13 February 2007 Table of contents ECRIPRT-CbC-III-2007-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-CbC-III-2007-004-ENG
Third report on Turkey
Third report on Turkey TUR 2004 06 25 2005 02 15 CRI 2005 5 Third report on Turkey Adopted on 25 June 2004 Strasbourg 15 February 2005 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI and about the ECRITUR-CbC-III-2005-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-CbC-III-2005-005-ENG
Toshev v. Tajikistan
Toshev v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/101/D/1499/2006 Communication number s : 1499/2006 Author: Temur Toshev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Tajikistan Submission date 11 Apr 2006 Date of decision 30 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1499/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1624/en-US
UMO ILINDEN AND IVANOV v. Bulgaria
UMO ILINDEN AND IVANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 15/02/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Freedom of association: Freedom of assembly of organisations which aim to achieve the recognition of the Macedonian minority in Bulgaria due to prohibitions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14619
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 19/04/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the unjustified refusals of the courts between 1999 and 2015 to register associations the aim of which is to achieve the recognition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3657
V.S. v. Belarus
V.S. v. Belarus CCPR/C/103/D/1749/2008 Communication number s : 1749/2008 Author: V.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 103 Country Belarus Submission date 18 May 2007 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1749/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1642/en-US
VALASINAS v. Lithuania
VALASINAS v. Lithuania LTU 24/10/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention and protection of private life and correspondence: Inhuman treatment with regard to a body search and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4179
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262
VIRABYAN v. Armenia
VIRABYAN v. Armenia ARM 02/01/2013 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: These cases concern substantive and procedural violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention 1 on account of the applicants death or torture and the lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-355
WALCZAK v. Poland
WALCZAK v. Poland POL 09/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unnecessary interference due to the authorities refusal of family visits by the applicant s wife during detention. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55603
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC A/HRC/13/30/Add.2 from 19 January 2009 to 23 January 2009 18 January 2010 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Malta United Nations A/HRC/13/30/Add.2 Distr.: General General Assembly 18 January 2010 Original: English Human Rights Council UNSPA/HRC/13/30/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f13%2f30%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (Country visit)
Report to HRC A/HRC/10/21/Add.4 from 22 October 2008 to 11 November 2008 9 February 2009 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Country visit Ukraine UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/10/21/Add.4 9 February 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN UNSPA/HRC/10/21/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f10%2f21%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
Report to HRC A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 from 27 June 2014 to 30 June 2014 10 September 2018 Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Montenegro United Nations A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 September 2018 English only Human UNSPA/HRC/39/46/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f39%2f46%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
Y.H.A. v. Australia
Y.H.A. v. Australia CAT/C/27/D/162/2000 Communication number s : 162/2000 Author: Y.H.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Australia Submission date 14 Apr 2000 Date of decision 23 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/27/D/162/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/195/en-US
Zare v. Sweden
Zare v. Sweden CAT/C/36/D/256/2004 Communication number s : 256/2004 Author: Mehdi Zare Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Sweden Submission date 22 Sep 2004 Date of decision 12 May 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/36/D/256/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/114/en-US
de Lorenzo v. Italy
de Lorenzo v. Italy CCPR/C/90/D/1419/2005 Communication number s : 1419/2005 Author: Francesco de Lorenzo Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country Italy Submission date 01 Feb 2005 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1419/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1372/en-US
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato (UNADIS) v. Italy, Complaint No. 147/2017
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato UNADIS v. Italy Complaint No. 147/2017 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 01 04 000 04 01 000 04 04 000 05 00 000 06 04 000 24 00 163 91 00 163 2021 06 30 2021 11 10 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-147-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-147-2017-dmerits-en
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC