Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 144
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
16. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 16. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance New York 20 December 2006 Entry into force : 23 December 2010 in accordance with article 39 1 which UNIV-16https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-16&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
Adamovich v. Belarus
Adamovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015 Communication number s : 2619/2015 Author: Marina Adamovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3156/en-US
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012 Communication number s : 2175/2012 Author: Adelaida Kim Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 05 Feb 2009 Date of decision 04 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2483/en-US
Amanklychev v. Turkmenistan
Amanklychev v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/116/D/2078/2011 Communication number s : 2078/2011 Author: Annakurban Amanklychev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 27 May 2009 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2078/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2111/en-US
Andrei Sannikov v. Belarus
Andrei Sannikov v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2212/2012 Communication number s : 2212/2012 Author: Andrei Sannikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Jul 2012 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2212/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2488/en-US
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
Cáceres et al. v. Paraguay
C ceres et al. v. Paraguay CCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016 Communication number s : 2751/2016 Author: Norma Portillo C ceres on her own behalf and that of her deceased brother Rub n Portillo C ceres Hermenegilda C ceres Isabel Bord n Ram rez on her own behalf and JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2784/en-US
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF ANŽELIKA ŠIMAITIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF AN ELIKA IMAITIEN v. LITHUANIA 36093/13 P KIEN A. LTU 4/21/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions 369 304 321 542 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0421JUD003609313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202360
CASE OF APOSTU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF APOSTU v. ROMANIA 22765/12 MATEUT G. ROU 2/3/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0203JUD002276512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-150781
CASE OF FEDORCHUK v. UKRAINE
CASE OF FEDORCHUK v. UKRAINE 20746/05 N/A UKR 11/15/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 13 445 444 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1115JUD002074605 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF FEDORCHUK v. UKRAINE Application no. 20746/05 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 November ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1115JUD002074605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83312
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY
CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY 4871/16 KALECK W. DEU 2/16/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD000487116https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208279
CASE OF HUMMATOV v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF HUMMATOV v. AZERBAIJAN 9852/03 13413/04 FERSCHTMAN M. AZE 11/29/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 3 Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1129JUD000985203https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83588
CASE OF HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. POLAND
CASE OF HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. POLAND 7511/13 HUGHES P. DUFFY H. VANDOVA V. MARGULIES J. MICKUM G.B. JANKOWSKI B. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000751113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146047
CASE OF KARABET AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF KARABET AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE 38906/07 52025/07 BUSHCHENKO A.P. UKR 1/17/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Article 35 3 Ratione personae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0117JUD003890607https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115886