Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1391
A. B. A. O. v. France,Tunisia
A. B. A. O. v. France Tunisia CAT/C/39/D/264/2005 Communication number s : 264/2005 Author: A. B. A. O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 39 Country France Tunisia Submission date 24 Jan 2005 Date of decision 08 Nov 2007 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/39/D/264/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/86/en-US
A.C. AND OTHERS v. Spain
A.C. AND OTHERS v. Spain ESP 22/07/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: The applicants in this case are thirty persons of Saharawi origin who had their requests for international protection dismissed by the administration in 2011 and 2012 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5782
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/AZE/CO/3 NULL 2021 11 02T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/AZE/CO/3 International Convention on the Distr.: General 2 November 2021 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English Members of UHRICMW/C/AZE/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/810bc6b3-220e-49c4-b27f-bc6094ebb6a1
Ad hoc Report on Greece (Rule 34)
Ad hoc Report on Greece Rule 34 GRC 2019 12 06 2019 12 18 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Public Publication: 18 December 2019 Greco AdHocRep 2019 2 Ad hoc Report on GREECE Rule 34 Adopted by GRECO at its 84th Plenary Meeting Strasbourg 2 6 December 2019 I. GRECOGreco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIC
Addendum to the Second Compliance Report of Third Evaluation Round on Turkey
Addendum to the Second Compliance Report of Third Evaluation Round on Turkey TUR 2019 03 22 2019 06 28 Adoption: 22 March 2019 Public Publication: 28 June 2019 GrecoRC3 2019 3 Third Evaluation Round Addendum to the Second Compliance Report on Turkey GRECOGrecoRC3(2019)3-Final-eng-Turkey-Add2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC3(2019)3-Final-eng-Turkey-Add2ndRC-PUBLIC
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows (ETS No. 181)
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows ETS No. 181 181 Strasbourg 2001 11 08T00:00:00 Treaty open for COEETS No. 181https://rm.coe.int/1680080626
Additional Protocol to the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 191)
Additional Protocol to the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption ETS No. 191 191 Strasbourg 2003 05 15T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by States signatories to treaty ETS 173 Strasbourg 2005 02 01T00:00:00 5 Ratifications. This Protocol extends the COEETS No. 191https://rm.coe.int/168008370e
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on State Immunity (ETS No. 074A)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on State Immunity ETS No. 074A 074A Basel 1972 05 16T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 74 and for accession by the non member States which have acceded to COEETS No. 074Ahttps://rm.coe.int/16800730b2
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Alger v. Australia
Alger v. Australia CCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013 Communication number s : 2237/2013 Author: Christopher Alger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2315/en-US
Aliboeva v. Tajikistan
Aliboeva v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/85/D/985/2001 Communication number s : 985/2001 Author: Kholinisso Aliboeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Tajikistan Submission date 10 Jul 2001 Date of decision 18 Oct 2005 Comment: Under rule 92 JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/985/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1195/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Andrés Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia
Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia CCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015 Communication number s : 2537/2015 Author: Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Colombia Submission date 11 Aug 2014 Date of decision 27 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2501/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/BIH/CO/3 NULL 2019 11 04T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/BIH/CO/3 International Convention on the Distr.: General 4 November 2019 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English UHRICMW/C/BIH/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4b5dc60f-cba6-4aeb-9214-73d25190ded9
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US