Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1758
3. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 3. International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 3 January 1976 in accordance with article 27. 1 Registration : 3 January 1976 No. UNIV-3https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-3&chapter=4&clang=_en
A. B. A. O. v. France,Tunisia
A. B. A. O. v. France Tunisia CAT/C/39/D/264/2005 Communication number s : 264/2005 Author: A. B. A. O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 39 Country France Tunisia Submission date 24 Jan 2005 Date of decision 08 Nov 2007 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/39/D/264/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/86/en-US
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
A.L. v. Spain
A.L. v. Spain CRC/C/81/D/16/2017 Communication number s : 016/2017 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Spain Submission date 15 May 2017 Date of decision 31 May 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/81/D/16/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2526/en-US
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows (ETS No. 181)
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows ETS No. 181 181 Strasbourg 2001 11 08T00:00:00 Treaty open for COEETS No. 181https://rm.coe.int/1680080626
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes (CETS No. 203)
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes CETS No. 203 203 Strasbourg 2008 11 27T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the Signatories to Treaty ETS 164 Strasbourg 2018 07 COECETS No. 203https://rm.coe.int/1680084824
Additional Protocol to the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 191)
Additional Protocol to the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption ETS No. 191 191 Strasbourg 2003 05 15T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by States signatories to treaty ETS 173 Strasbourg 2005 02 01T00:00:00 5 Ratifications. This Protocol extends the COEETS No. 191https://rm.coe.int/168008370e
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Alger v. Australia
Alger v. Australia CCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013 Communication number s : 2237/2013 Author: Christopher Alger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2315/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BLR/CO/5 NULL 2018 06 07T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BLR/CO/5 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 7 June 2018 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/BLR/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/36feac0c-37fb-4702-8666-4c3cc1c7b33b
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
Baroy v. Philippines
Baroy v. Philippines CCPR/C/79/D/1045/2002 Communication number s : 1045/2002 Author: Alfredo Baroy Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Philippines Submission date 04 Jan 2002 Date of decision 31 Oct 2003 Comment: Under rule JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1045/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/372/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Bujdosó v. Hungary
Bujdos v. Hungary CRPD/C/10/D/4/2011 Communication number s : 004/2011 Author: J nos Fiala Disability Rights Center Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Hungary Submission date 14 Sep 2011 Date of decision 09 Sep 2013 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/10/D/4/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1988/en-US
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769