Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1941 - 1960 of 1962
VYERENTSOV v. Ukraine
VYERENTSOV v. Ukraine UKR 11/07/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Vyerentsov group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to freedom of assembly violation of Article 11 . The Vyerentsov case concerns violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31279
Vivian Maritza Hincapié Dávila v. Colombia
Vivian Maritza Hincapi D vila v. Colombia CCPR/C/122/D/2490/2014/REV.1 Communication number s : 2490/2014 Author: Vivian Maritza Hincapi D vila Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 122 Country Colombia Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2490/2014/REV.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2437/en-US
WERZ v. Switzerland
WERZ v. Switzerland CHE 17/03/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings due to a judgment notification of the Supreme Court of the Canton of Berne 15 months EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4738
Weiss v. Austria
Weiss v. Austria CCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002 Communication number s : 1086/2002 Author: Sholam Weiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Austria Submission date 24 May 2002 Date of decision 03 Apr 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of its rules JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1048/en-US
Wooden v. Mexico
Wooden v. Mexico CAT/C/71/D/759/2016 Communication number s : 759/2016 Author: Ronald James Wooden Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Mexico Submission date 07 Jul 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/759/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3357/en-US
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
Report to HRC A/HRC/16/48/Add.1 from 14 June 2010 to 21 June 2010 28 December 2010 Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Bosnia and Herzegovina United Nations A/HRC/16/48/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 December 2010 Original: UNSPA/HRC/16/48/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f16%2f48%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Wright v. Jamaica
Wright v. Jamaica CCPR/C/45/D/349/1989 Communication number s : 349/1989 Author: Clifton Wright Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Jamaica Submission date 12 Jan 1989 Date of decision 27 Jul 1992 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/349/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/423/en-US
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010 Communication number s : 2007/2010 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Nov 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1816/en-US
X v. Lithuania
X v. Lithuania CCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015 Communication number s : 2564/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Lithuania Submission date 14 Aug 2014 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3318/en-US
YONCHEV v. Bulgaria
YONCHEV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: This case concerns the competent authorities failure between 2003 and 2008 to fulfil their positive obligation arising under Article 8 of the Convention to provide the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49163
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US
Z.B.E. v. Spain
Z.B.E. v. Spain CCPR/C/127/D/3085/2017 Communication number s : 3085/2017 Author: Z.B.E. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Spain Submission date 29 May 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/3085/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2884/en-US
Z.B. v. Hungary
Z.B. v. Hungary CCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016 Communication number s : 2768/2016 Author: Z.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 123 Country Hungary Submission date 23 May 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2538/en-US
Z.H. v. Hungary
Z.H. v. Hungary HUN 08/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant who is deaf and dumb suffering from an intellectual disability illiterate and unable to avail himself of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10545
Z.W. v. Australia
Z.W. v. Australia CAT/C/62/D/669/2015 Communication number s : 669/2015 Author: Z.W. represented by counsel Frances Milne Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Australia Submission date 20 Mar 2015 Date of decision 28 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/669/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2413/en-US
ZAJA v. Croatia
ZAJA v. Croatia HRV 04/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: The cases aja and Lopac concern violations of the applicants right not to be punished without law on account of their conviction of an administrative offence for importing goods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45943