Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2381 - 2400 of 2853
PROJECT-TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia
PROJECT TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia HRV 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: This case concerns the unlawful interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions due to the cancellation and revocation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57449
Paksas v. Lithuania
Paksas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012 Communication number s : 2155/2012 Author: Rolandas Paksas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1819/en-US
Paraga v. Croatia
Paraga v. Croatia CCPR/C/71/D/727/1996 Communication number s : 727/1996 Author: Dobroslav Paraga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Croatia Submission date 16 Apr 1996 Date of decision 04 Apr 2001 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/71/D/727/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/913/en-US
Parfenenka v. Belarus
Parfenenka v. Belarus CCPR/C/134/D/2737/2016 Communication number s : 2737/2016 Author: Viktor Parfenenka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Oct 2015 Date of decision 15 Mar 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2737/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3059/en-US
Perera v. Sri Lanka
Perera v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/78/D/1091/2002 Communication number s : 1091/2002 Author: Wannakuwatte Perera Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 18 Apr 2002 Date of decision 07 Aug 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1091/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/965/en-US
Pestaño v. Philippines
Pesta o v. Philippines CCPR/C/98/D/1619/2007 Communication number s : 1619/2007 Author: Felipe and Evelyn Pesta o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Philippines Submission date 24 Apr 2007 Date of decision 23 Mar 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1619/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1564/en-US
Petromelidis v. Greece
Petromelidis v. Greece CCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017 Communication number s : 3065/2017 Author: Lazaros Petromelidis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Greece Submission date 31 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3196/en-US
Pham v. Canada
Pham v. Canada CCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006 Communication number s : 1534/2006 Author: The Trinh Pham Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Canada Submission date 18 Jul 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1009/en-US
Picq v. France
Picq v. France CCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007 Communication number s : 1632/2007 Author: Raymond Jacques Picq Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country France Submission date 28 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1023/en-US
Pinkney v. Canada
Pinkney v. Canada CCPR/C/14/D/27/1977 Communication number s : 027/1977 Author: Larry James Pinkney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 14 Country Canada Submission date 25 Nov 1977 Date of decision 29 Oct 1981 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/14/D/27/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/458/en-US
Pratt and Morgan v. Jamaica
Pratt and Morgan v. Jamaica CCPR/C/35/D/210/1986 Communication number s : 210/1986 225/1987 Author: Earl Pratt Ivan Morgan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Jamaica Submission date 12 Jan 1986 Date of decision 06 Apr 1989 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/210/1986https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/308/en-US
Protocol to the European Agreement on the Protection of Television Broadcasts (ETS No. 054) (*)
Protocol to the European Agreement on the Protection of Television Broadcasts ETS No. 054 054 Strasbourg 1965 01 22T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part of ETS 34 and is closed to legal acts. Strasbourg 1965 03 COEETS No. 054https://rm.coe.int/168006ff5c
Protocol to the European Code of Social Security (ETS No. 048A)
Protocol to the European Code of Social Security ETS No. 048A 048A Strasbourg 1964 04 16T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 48 and for accession by the non member States which have acceded to Treaty ETS 48 COEETS No. 048Ahttps://rm.coe.int/168006b65f
Purna Maya v. Nepal
Purna Maya v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013 Communication number s : 2245/2013 Author: Purna Maya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2238/en-US
QUINN v. Ireland
QUINN v. Ireland IRL 21/03/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 11:15:23 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to respect the right to remain silent and not to incriminate oneself following suspicion of having committed terrorist EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3239
R.G. v. Kyrgyzstan
R.G. v. Kyrgyzstan CEDAW/C/77/D/133/2018 Communication number s : 133/2018 Author: R.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 10 May 2018 Date of decision 03 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/77/D/133/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3130/en-US
R.K. v. Spain
R.K. v. Spain CRC/C/82/D/27/2017 Communication number s : 027/2017 Author: R.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Spain Submission date 20 Jul 2017 Date of decision 18 Sep 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/82/D/27/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2598/en-US
R.M. v. Burundi
R.M. v. Burundi CAT/C/72/D/793/2017 Communication number s : 793/2017 Author: R.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Burundi Submission date 27 Dec 2016 Date of decision 18 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/793/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3339/en-US
R.N. v. Finland
R.N. v. Finland CRC/C/85/D/98/2019 Communication number s : 098/2019 Author: R.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Online limited session Country Finland Submission date 15 Aug 2019 Date of decision 28 Sep 2020 Comment: This JUTBCRC/C/85/D/98/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2765/en-US
R.P.B. v. Philippines
R.P.B. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011 Communication number s : 034/2011 Author: R.P.B. represented by counsel Evalyn G. Ursua and Maria Karla L. Espinosa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Philippines Submission date 23 May JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1875/en-US