Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2518
A/HRC/47/14: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Rwanda
United Nations A/HRC/47/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/14https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4714-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-rwanda
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A.S. v. Turkey
A.S. v. Turkey TUR 28/03/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to delays by the administration in paying additional compensation awarded for expropriation and substantial difference EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28569
A.T. AND OTHERS v. Turkey
A.T. AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 17/10/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28793
AKA v. Turkey
AKA v. Turkey TUR 23/09/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26578
AKKUS v. Turkey
AKKUS v. Turkey TUR 09/07/1997 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5460
ALALOGLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ALALOGLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 04/02/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 10:43:07 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54715
ALGERIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ALGERIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/DZA/CO/2 NULL 2018 05 25T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/DZA/CO/2 International Convention on the Distr.: General 25 May 2018 Protection of the Rights of English All Migrant Workers and Original: French Members of UHRICMW/C/DZA/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/bdb784ca-7a7f-41ef-ab71-0d121b979f7f
ALPAY v. Turkey
ALPAY v. Turkey TUR 27/02/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities delay in paying the applicants additional compensation for the expropriation between the applicable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28629
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta MLT 15/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3181
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta MLT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 19/12/2016 09:27:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45813
ARGENTINA : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ARGENTINA : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/ARG/CO/5 NULL 2016 08 09T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/ARG/CO/5 International Covenant on Distr.: General 10 August 2016 Civil and Political Rights English Original: Spanish Human Rights Committee UHRICCPR/C/ARG/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/a97817dd-8121-40f1-8612-629dd45cfaa7
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/AZE/CO/4 NULL 2021 11 02T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/AZE/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 2 November 2021 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/AZE/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/70fcaf4b-f336-4518-9d1b-9db47dc63e10
Abdussamatov et al. v. Kazakhstan
Abdussamatov et al. v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/48/D/444/2010 Communication number s : 444/2010 Author: Toirjon Abdussamatov and 28 other complainants Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 48 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 24 Dec 2010 Date of JUTBCAT/C/48/D/444/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/30/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BLR/CO/4 6 NULL 2013 12 12T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BLR/CO/4 6 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 13 December 2013 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BLR/CO/4-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/92696eeb-1674-49e1-befc-fa63611f61d8