Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4001 - 4020 of 4234
Sunnet Jarrarow v. Turkmenistan
Sunnet Jarrarow v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/115/D/2223/2012 Communication number s : 2223/2012 Author: Sunnet Jarrarow Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 29 Oct 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2223/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2048/en-US
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia CAT/C/68/D/855/2017 Communication number s : 855/2017 Author: Susith Wasitha Ranawaka represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Australia Submission date 20 Nov JUTBCAT/C/68/D/855/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2699/en-US
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/39/D/303/2006 Communication number s : 303/2006 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Sep 2006 Date of decision 22 Nov 2007 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/39/D/303/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/88/en-US
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/226/2003 Communication number s : 226/2003 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Jan 2003 Date of decision 06 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/226/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/138/en-US
T.D.J. v. Denmark
T.D.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015 Communication number s : 2654/2015 Author: T.D.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Denmark Submission date 05 Oct 2015 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2813/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.P.S. v. Canada
T.P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/24/D/99/1997 Communication number s : 099/1997 Author: T.P.S. name withheld Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 19 Nov 1997 Date of decision 16 May 2000 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCAT/C/24/D/99/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/216/en-US
T.S. v. Russian Federation
T.S. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014 Communication number s : 69/2014 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3448/en-US
T.T. v. Ukraine
T.T. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/134/D/2985/2017 Communication number s : 2985/2017 Author: T.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Ukraine Submission date 19 Apr 2017 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2985/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3686/en-US
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011 Communication number s : 2044/2011 Author: T.V. and A.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Feb 2009 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2101/en-US
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia GEO 18/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This group of cases comprises 15 judgments concerning various substantive between 1999 and 2014 and procedural between 1999 and 2020 violations of Article 2 and Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5830
Tahar Ammari and Toufik Ammari v. Algeria
Tahar Ammari and Toufik Ammari v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2098/2011 Communication number s : 2098/2011 Author: Tahar Ammari represented by counsel Nassira Dutour of the Collectif des Famillesde Disparus en Alg rie Coalition of Families of Disappeared Persons JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2098/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1912/en-US
Taito Fa’afete v. New Zealand
Taito Fa afete v. New Zealand CCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009 Communication number s : 1909/2009 Author: Tony Ellis counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country New Zealand Submission date 12 May 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1983/en-US
Taous Azouz v. Algeria
Taous Azouz v. Algeria CCPR/C/108/D/1798/2008 Communication number s : 1798/2008 Author: Taous Azouz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Jul 2008 Date of decision 25 Jul 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/1798/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1796/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Third Evaluation Round Addendum to the Second Compliance Report on Latvia ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” * * * ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Addendum to the Second Compliance Report on Latvia Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding LVA 2014 03 28 2014 03 28 Strasbourg 28 March 2014 Public Greco RC III 2014 3E Third Evaluation Round Addendum to GRECOGreco-RC-III-2014-3E-Final-Addendum-to-Second-RC-Latvia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2014-3E-Final-Addendum-to-Second-RC-Latvia-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Andorra “Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” * * * “Transparency of political party funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Andorra Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of political party funding AND 2013 10 18 2013 11 22 Adoption: 18 October 2013 Public Publication: 22 November 2013 Greco RC III 2013 12E Third GRECOGreco-RC-III-2013-12E-Final-Andorra-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2013-12E-Final-Andorra-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Finland ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” *** ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Finland Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding FIN 2009 12 04 2009 12 04 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 4 December 2009 GRECOGreco-RC-III-2009-2E-Final-Finland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2009-2E-Final-Finland-PUBLIC