Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2101 - 2120 of 2218
Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/68 7 April 1998 10 March 1999 Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences Liechtenstein UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/68 10 March 1999 Original: ENGLISH UNSPE/CN.4/1999/68https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f68&Lang=en
Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/34/Add.4 from 2 July 2006 to 12 July 2006 7 February 2007 Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences Netherlands UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/4/34/Add.4 7 February 2007 UNSPA/HRC/4/34/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f34%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2005/72/Add.3 from 9 February 2004 to 14 February 2004 10 February 2005 Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences Guatemala UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council UNSPE/CN.4/2005/72/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2005%2f72%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 from 10 October 2004 to 21 October 2004 16 March 2005 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders T rkiye UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 UNSPE/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2005%2f101%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/86/D/915/2000 Communication number s : 915/2000 Author: Darmon Sultanova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Feb 2000 Date of decision 30 Mar 2006 Comment: In accordance JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/915/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1250/en-US
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Croatia* - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/HRV/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 February 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on Croatia UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/HRV/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-croatia-report-office-united-nations-high
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009 Communication number s : 1910/2009 Author: Svetlana Zhuk Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Oct 2009 Date of decision 30 Oct 2013 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1689/en-US
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/226/2003 Communication number s : 226/2003 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Jan 2003 Date of decision 06 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/226/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/138/en-US
T.P.S. v. Canada
T.P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/24/D/99/1997 Communication number s : 099/1997 Author: T.P.S. name withheld Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 19 Nov 1997 Date of decision 16 May 2000 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCAT/C/24/D/99/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/216/en-US
TARASOV v. Ukraine
TARASOV v. Ukraine UKR 31/01/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicant s right to participate effectively in his trial in December 2001: the Court held that he had been forced to appear before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31120
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TIMOFEYEV v. Russia
TIMOFEYEV v. Russia RUS 23/01/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice/Protection of property/Effective remedy: Non enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning the State s monetary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27520
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39501
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 15:06:12 Case Description: These cases concern a structural problem highlighted by the European Court applying the pilot judgment procedure of inhuman and degrading treatment caused by the poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52617
TONIOLO v. San Marino and Italy
TONIOLO v. San Marino and Italy SMR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:41:24 Case Description: Unlawful detention pending extradition: Domestic law was not sufficiently accessible precise and foreseeable in its application to avoid the risk of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11208
TRABELSI v. Belgium
TRABELSI v. Belgium BEL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Extradition / deportation protection against ill treatment: extradition in 2013 to the United States notwithstanding a risk of being sentenced for terrorist activities to an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1241
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia GEO 18/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This group of cases comprises 15 judgments concerning various substantive between 1999 and 2014 and procedural between 1999 and 2020 violations of Article 2 and Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5830
TSONYO TSONEV v. Bulgaria
TSONYO TSONEV v. Bulgaria BGR 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: Right not to be tried or punished twice: Imposition of an administrative fine and a sentence of 18 months imprisonment essentially for the same offence an initial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58419
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 14/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60049
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Armenia ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” * * * ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Armenia Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding ARM 2012 12 07 2012 12 17 Adoption: 7 December 2012 Public Publication: 17 December 2012 Greco RC III 2012 21E Third Evaluation Round GRECOGreco-RC-III-2012-21E-Final-Armenia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2012-21E-Final-Armenia-PUBLIC