Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2201 - 2218 of 2218
X v. Denmark
X v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2389/2014 Communication number s : 2389/2014 Author: Helle Holm Thomsen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Denmark Submission date 12 May 2014 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2389/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2061/en-US
X v. Russian Federation
X v. Russian Federation CAT/C/54/D/542/2013 Communication number s : 542/2013 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Russian Federation Submission date 04 Feb 2013 Date of decision 08 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/54/D/542/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1955/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/765/2016 Communication number s : 765/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Aug 2016 Date of decision 23 Nov 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/65/D/765/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2591/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y. v. Switzerland
Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/50/D/431/2010 Communication number s : 431/2010 Author: Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Switzerland Submission date 31 Aug 2010 Date of decision 21 May 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/50/D/431/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/10/en-US
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YOH-EKALE MWANJE v. Belgium
YOH EKALE MWANJE v. Belgium BEL 20/03/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection against inhuman treatment against expulsion and lack of effective remedy: Inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by a Cameroonian national an illegal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1543
Yakovitsky et al. v. Belarus
Yakovitsky et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/128/D/2789/2016 Communication number s : 2789/2016 Author: Gennady Yakovitsky and Aleksandra Yakovitskaya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Jul 2016 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2789/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2825/en-US
Yevdokimov and Rezanov v. Russian Federation
Yevdokimov and Rezanov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/101/D/1410/2005 Communication number s : 1410/2005 Author: Denis Yevdokimov and Artiom Rezanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Mar 2004 JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1410/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1609/en-US
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US
Z.S. v. Georgia
Z.S. v. Georgia CAT/C/70/D/915/2019 Communication number s : 915/2019 Author: Z.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Georgia Submission date 03 Jan 2019 Date of decision 30 Dec 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/70/D/915/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3421/en-US
Z.T. v. Norway
Z.T. v. Norway CAT/C/23/D/127/1999 Communication number s : 127/1999 Author: Z.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country Norway Submission date 25 Jan 1998 Date of decision 19 Nov 1999 Comment: Under rule 108 paragraph 9 of the JUTBCAT/C/23/D/127/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/220/en-US
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine UKR 22/08/2018 00:00:00 05/09/2018 11:48:13 Case Description: The cases 1 of this group concern the long lasting moratorium on the alienation of agricultural land found by the Court to be in violation of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50173
ZHBANOV v. Bulgaria
ZHBANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/10/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings due to lengthy periods of inactivity at the pre trial stage repeated remittals of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3595
Zhaslan Suleimenov v. Kazakhstan
Zhaslan Suleimenov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/119/D/2146/2012 Communication number s : 2146/2012 Author: Zhaslan Suleimenov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 14 Jan 2011 Date of decision 21 Mar 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2146/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2261/en-US
v. Trinidad and Tobago
v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/64/D/752/1997 Communication number s : 752/1997 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/64/D/752/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1783/en-US