Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2458
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
A.D. v. Cyprus
A.D. v. Cyprus CAT/C/75/D/1065/2021 Communication number s : 1065/2021 Author: A.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Cyprus Submission date 18 Mar 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1065/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3610/en-US
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.S. v. Nepal
A.S. v. Nepal CCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011 Communication number s : 2077/2011 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Jul 2011 Date of decision 06 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2045/en-US
A and B v. Azerbaijan
A and B v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/74/D/905/2018 Communication number s : 905/2018 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 22 Dec 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/905/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3586/en-US
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
ANNONI DI GUSSOLA AND OTHERS v. France
ANNONI DI GUSSOLA AND OTHERS v. France FRA 14/02/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the Court of Cassation President s decision under a specific provision of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33009
AYCAGUER v. France
AYCAGUER v. France FRA 22/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the applicant s refusal in the context of a criminal sanction to comply with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47815
Ahmet Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan
Ahmet Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/115/D/2222/2012 Communication number s : 2222/2012 Author: Ahmet Hudaybergenov represented by counsel Shane H. Brady Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2222/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2041/en-US
Akmurad Nurjanov v. Turkmenistan
Akmurad Nurjanov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2225/2012 Communication number s : 2225/2012 Author: Akmurad Nurjanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 15 Jul 2016 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2225/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2222/en-US
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012 Communication number s : 2227/2012 Author: Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2135/en-US
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012 Communication number s : 2227/2012 Author: Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2179/en-US
Anatoly Poplavny v. Belarus
Anatoly Poplavny v. Belarus CCPR/C/115/D/2019/2010 Communication number s : 2019/2010 Author: Anatoly Poplavny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Belarus Submission date 23 May 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2019/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2030/en-US
BRAGI GUÐMUNDUR KRISTJÁNSSON v. Iceland
BRAGI GU MUNDUR KRISTJ NSSON v. Iceland ISL 30/11/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: These cases concern the violations of Article 4 of Protocol 7 right not to be tried or punished twice ne bis in idem on the account of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59201
BULENA v. the Czech Republic
BULENA v. the Czech Republic CZE 20/07/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to the Constitutional Court due to its excessively formal interpretation of the admissibility rules. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6120
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
Berzig v. Algeria
Berzig v. Algeria CCPR/C/103/D/1781/2008 Communication number s : 1781/2008 Author: Fatma Zohra Berzig Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Algeria Submission date 08 Feb 2008 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1781/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1645/en-US