Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1041 - 1060 of 1154
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan AZE 10/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The application No. 65286/13 concerns violations of the rights of the applicant a renowned investigative journalist to respect for her private life and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52409
KIRIL IVANOV v. Bulgaria
KIRIL IVANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2018 00:00:00 26/06/2018 09:44:04 Case Description: Freedom of assembly and lack of effective remedy: Unjustified interference due to the prohibition of a rally planned on behalf of the unregistered organisation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49699
KULINSKI AND SABEV v. Bulgaria
KULINSKI AND SABEV v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: These cases concern the impossibility for the applicants to vote in parliamentary elections or in elections to the European Parliament between 2009 and 2019 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39505
Kirill Nepomnyashchiy v. Russian Federation
Kirill Nepomnyashchiy v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/123/D/2318/2013 Communication number s : 2318/2013 Author: Kirill Nepomnyashchiy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Oct 2013 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2318/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2546/en-US
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
LITHUANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
LITHUANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/LTU/CO/3 NULL 2023 03 14T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/LTU/CO/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 30 March 2023 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/LTU/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6d4b4087-7a0e-42f5-bf76-6ff7ce7e5f83
Mátyus v. Slovakia
M tyus v. Slovakia CCPR/C/75/D/923/2000 Communication number s : 923/2000 Author: Istvan M tyus Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Slovakia Submission date 15 Oct 1999 Date of decision 22 Jul 2002 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/923/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1004/en-US
Maksudov, Rakhimov, Tashbaev and Pirmatov v. Kyrgyzstan,Uzbekistan
Maksudov Rakhimov Tashbaev and Pirmatov v. Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan CCPR/C/93/D/1461 1462 1476 1477/2006 Communication number s : 1476/2006 1462/2006 1477/2006 1461/2006 Author: Zhakhongir Maksudov and Adil Rakhimov Yakub Tashbaev and Rasuldzhon Pirmatov JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1461,1462,1476&1477/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1445/en-US
Mansour Leghaei et al v. Australia
Mansour Leghaei et al v. Australia CCPR/C/113/D/1937/2010 Communication number s : 1937/2010 Author: Mansour Leghaei et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Australia Submission date 16 Apr 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1937/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1951/en-US
Marie-Louise Jüngelin v. Sweden
Marie Louise J ngelin v. Sweden CRPD/C/12/D/5/2011 Communication number s : 005/2011 Author: Swedish Association of Visually Impaired Youth US and the Swedish Association of the Visually Impaired SRF Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 JUTBCRPD/C/12/D/5/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2006/en-US
Michael Lockrey v. Australia
Michael Lockrey v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/13/2013 Communication number s : 013/2013 Author: Michael Lockrey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 08 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/13/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2143/en-US
NASIROV AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan
NASIROV AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan AZE 20/06/2020 00:00:00 29/06/2020 11:35:05 Case Description: The case of Religious Community of Jehovah s Witnesses concerns a violation of the applicant community s freedom of expression on account of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55459
NEW ZEALAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NEW ZEALAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/NZL/CO/4 NULL 2018 05 01T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/NZL/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 1 May 2018 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/NZL/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f73591e6-82e2-4873-bc3a-4d8262362131
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/133/D/2904/2016 Communication number s : 2904/2016 2907/2016 Author: Ermek Narymbaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 07 Oct 2016 Date of decision 20 Oct 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2904/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3160/en-US
P. S. N. v. Denmark
P. S. N. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/36/2006 Communication number s : 036/2006 Author: P. S. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Feb 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/36/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1733/en-US
PAKDEMIRLI v. Turkey
PAKDEMIRLI v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The cases concern unjustified interference with the applicants right to freedom of expression as a result of civil defamation proceedings Article 49 of the Code of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37218
PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. Norway
PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 07/09/2020 00:00:00 23/09/2020 10:56:42 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of authorities to protect the biological parents right to family life due to shortcomings in the balancing exercise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55909
POEM and FASM v. Denmark
POEM and FASM v. Denmark CERD/C/62/D/22/2002 Communication number s : 022/2002 Author: POEM and FASM Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 08 Aug 2001 Date of decision 19 Mar 2003 Comment: This document JUTBCERD/C/62/D/22/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1758/en-US
PRYANISHNIKOV v. Russia
PRYANISHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 10/12/2019 00:00:00 30/01/2020 15:52:04 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of a film reproduction license in 2003 without relevant and sufficient reasons violation of Article 10 . In particular the Court found EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54689
RABCZEWSKA v. Poland
RABCZEWSKA v. Poland POL 30/01/2023 00:00:00 13/02/2023 14:31:45 Case Description: The applicant popular pop singer was convicted by domestic court in 2012 to a fine for offending religious feelings of others through publicly insulting the Bible without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62557