Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9381 - 9400 of 9569
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan AZE 19/07/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The seven remaining applicants in this group the former Ilgar Mammadov group are human rights defenders civil society activists and a journalist. They were all the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50875
MARGUSHIN v. Russia
MARGUSHIN v. Russia RUS 01/07/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty due to the non enforcement of a judgment resulting in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13735
MERABISHVILI v. Georgia
MERABISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 28/11/2017 00:00:00 13/12/2017 10:54:38 Case Description: The case concerns violations suffered by the applicant a former Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior of Georgia during his pre trial detention in the context of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48437
MERIT v. Ukraine
MERIT v. Ukraine UKR 30/06/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31316
MILADINOV AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
MILADINOV AND OTHERS v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 46398/09 50570/09 50576/09 GODZO D. GODZO A. MKD 4/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 3 Reasonableness of pre trial detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD004639809https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142521
MURUZHEVA v. Russia
MURUZHEVA v. Russia RUS 15/08/2018 00:00:00 29/08/2018 11:04:33 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50109
Madhewoo v. Mauritius
Madhewoo v. Mauritius CCPR/C/131/D/3163/2018 Communication number s : 3163/2018 Author: Maharajah Madhewoo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Mauritius Submission date 15 Dec 2017 Date of decision 24 Mar 2021 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3163/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3238/en-US
Mariategui et al. v. Argentina
Mariategui et al. v. Argentina CCPR/C/84/D/1371/2005 Communication number s : 1371/2005 Author: Eduardo Mariategui Mirta Honorina Mattiusi de Mariategui Francisco Jos Mariategui and Alicia Beatriz Fern ndez de Mariategui Type of decision: Inadmissibility JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1371/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1182/en-US
Mavlonov and Sa'di v. Uzbekistan
Mavlonov and Sa di v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/95/D/1334/2004 Communication number s : 1334/2004 Author: Rakhim Mavlonov and Shansiy Sa di Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Nov 2004 Date of decision 19 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1334/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1486/en-US
McTaggart v. Jamaica
McTaggart v. Jamaica CCPR/C/62/D/749/1997 Communication number s : 749/1997 Author: Deon McTaggart Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Jamaica Submission date 10 Apr 1997 Date of decision 31 Mar 1998 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/62/D/749/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/842/en-US
Meïssa Wade v. Senegal
Me ssa Wade v. Senegal CCPR/C/124/D/2783/2016 Communication number s : 2783/2016 Author: Karim Me ssa Wade Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Senegal Submission date 31 May 2016 Date of decision 23 Oct 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2783/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3325/en-US
Mejdoub Chani v. Algeria
Mejdoub Chani v. Algeria CCPR/C/116/D/2297/2013 Communication number s : 2297/2013 Author: Mejdoub Chani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Algeria Submission date 15 Jul 2013 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2297/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2107/en-US
Muñoz García v. Spain
Mu oz Garc a v. Spain E/C.12/71/D/39/2018 Communication number s : 39/2018 Author: Leonardo Fabio Mu oz Garc a Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Spain Submission date 21 Jun 2018 Date of decision 28 Feb 2022 Comment: This JUTBE/C.12/71/D/39/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2996/en-US
N.K. v. Netherlands
N.K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013 Communication number s : 2326/2013 Author: N.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 Dec 2013 Date of decision 18 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3103/en-US
N.K. v. Netherlands
N.K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013/REV.1 Communication number s : 2326/2013 Author: N.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 Dec 2013 Date of decision 18 Jul 2017 Comment: Annex: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013/REV.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2317/en-US
N. v. Romania (no. 2)
N. v. Romania no. 2 ROU 16/02/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental health conditions substantive violation of Article 2 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59831
NAUMOSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
NAUMOSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 27/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial in particular the right to adversarial proceedings due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6500
NAYDYON v. Ukraine
NAYDYON v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to provide prisoners with effective access to the documents from their case files needed to substantiate their applications before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31118
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
Njamba and Balikosa v. Democratic Republic of the Congo,Sweden
Njamba and Balikosa v. Democratic Republic of the Congo Sweden CAT/C/44/D/322/2007 Communication number s : 322/2007 Author: Eveline Njamba and her daughter Kathy Balikosa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Democratic Republic of JUTBCAT/C/44/D/322/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/70/en-US