Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1701 - 1720 of 2426
Lichtensztejn v. Uruguay
Lichtensztejn v. Uruguay CCPR/C/18/D/77/1980 Communication number s : 077/1980 Author: Samuel Lichtensztejn Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 18 Country Uruguay Submission date 30 Sep 1980 Date of decision 31 Mar 1983 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/77/1980https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/315/en-US
Lopez Burgos v. Uruguay
Lopez Burgos v. Uruguay CCPR/C/13/D/52/1979 Communication number s : 052/1979 Author: Delia Saldias de Lopez alleged victim s wife Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 13 Country Uruguay Submission date 06 Jun 1979 Date of decision 29 Jul 1981 JUTBCCPR/C/13/D/52/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/298/en-US
Loth v. Germany
Loth v. Germany CCPR/C/98/D/1754/2008 Communication number s : 1754/2008 Author: Edith Loth and her heirs Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Germany Submission date 29 May 2007 Date of decision 23 Mar 2010 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1754/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1578/en-US
Ltaief v. Tunisia
Ltaief v. Tunisia CAT/C/31/D/189/2001 Communication number s : 189/2001 Author: Bouabdallah Ltaief Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Tunisia Submission date 30 Jun 2000 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/189/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/163/en-US
M.A.S. and L.B.H. v. Denmark
M.A.S. and L.B.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/121/D/2585/2015 Communication number s : 2585/2015 Author: M.A.S. and L.B.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Denmark Submission date 09 Mar 2015 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2585/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2354/en-US
M.B. v. Czech Republic
M.B. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/106/D/1849/2008 Communication number s : 1849/2008 Author: M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 106 Country Czech Republic Submission date 24 Apr 2006 Date of decision 29 Oct 2012 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1849/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1663/en-US
M'Barek v. Tunisia
M Barek v. Tunisia CAT/C/23/D/60/1996 Communication number s : 060/1996 Author: Khaled M Barek Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country Tunisia Submission date 06 Nov 1996 Date of decision 10 Nov 1999 Comment: See also Communication No. JUTBCAT/C/23/D/60/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/219/en-US
M. G. v. Germany
M. G. v. Germany CCPR/C/93/D/1482/2006 Communication number s : 1482/2006 Author: M. G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Germany Submission date 26 May 2006 Date of decision 23 Jul 2008 Comment: A request for interim measures was JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1482/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1435/en-US
M.G. v. Switzerland
M.G. v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/811/2017 Communication number s : 811/2017 Author: M.G. represented by counsels Boris Wijkstr m et Gabriella Tau Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 03 Mar 2017 Date of JUTBCAT/C/65/D/811/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2477/en-US
M.P.M., v. Canada
M.P.M. v. Canada CEDAW/C/51/D/25/2010 Communication number s : 025/2010 Author: M.P.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 51 Country Canada Submission date 25 Mar 2010 Date of decision 24 Feb 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/51/D/25/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1705/en-US
M.S. aka M.H.H.A.D v. Denmark
M.S. aka M.H.H.A.D v. Denmark CCPR/C/120/D/2601/2015 Communication number s : 2601/2015 Author: M.S. aka M.H.H.A.D Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Denmark Submission date 30 Mar 2015 Date of decision 27 Jul 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2601/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2323/en-US
M.Z. v. Belgium
M.Z. v. Belgium CAT/C/67/D/813/2017 Communication number s : 813/2017 Author: M.Z. represented by counsel Wolfgang Kaleck European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Belgium JUTBCAT/C/67/D/813/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2627/en-US
MACOVEI AND OTHERS v. Romania
MACOVEI AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 21/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of an effective investigation of the applicants assault by their neighbours in a dispute in 1998. Article 3 procedural limb EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16203
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 24/09/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:11:36 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3435
MARIUSZ LEWANDOWSKI v. Poland
MARIUSZ LEWANDOWSKI v. Poland POL 03/10/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Violation of Article 6 1 of the Convention and the right to an impartial tribunal as the same judge in 2009 who applied a disciplinary penalty as consequence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20620
MARSHALL ISLANDS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
MARSHALL ISLANDS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/MHL/CO/3 4 NULL 2018 02 27T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/MHL/CO/3 4 Convention on the Distr.: General 27 February 2018 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child UHRICRC/C/MHL/CO/3-4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0c267521-71ff-4a4b-a01f-13de092cfb34
MAURITANIA : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM
MAURITANIA : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM CAT/OP/MRT/2 NULL 2018 09 24T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/MRT/2 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 24 September 2018 English and UHRICAT/OP/MRT/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f5c3cb49-acda-4be4-8afb-717a18863cfd
MENCKEBERG v. the Netherlands
MENCKEBERG v. the Netherlands NLD 22/02/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Appeal Court resulting in the applicant s conviction to a four months prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4451
MGN LIMITED v. the United Kingdom
MGN LIMITED v. the United Kingdom GBR 18/04/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:16:22 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant publishing company s obligation as a defendant in domestic privacy proceedings it had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2208
MICRONESIA (FEDERAL STATES OF): CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
MICRONESIA FEDERAL STATES OF : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/FSM/CO/2 NULL 2020 04 03T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/FSM/CO/2 Convention on the Distr.: General 3 April 2020 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child UHRICRC/C/FSM/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9b4417b2-2da0-4d81-964c-3641e00a24e8