Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9541 - 9560 of 9747
VISIT TO UZBEKISTAN - REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES AND LAWYERS
VISIT TO UZBEKISTAN REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES AND LAWYERS A/HRC/44/47/ADD.1 NULL 2020 04 20T00:00:00 SR Independence of judges United Nations A/HRC/44/47/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 April 2020 Original: UHRIA/HRC/44/47/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/08c34eb5-b125-4a78-b87a-52cd3ee6e682
VISIT TO VIET NAM - REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD
VISIT TO VIET NAM REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD A/HRC/40/56/ADD.1 NULL 2018 12 18T00:00:00 SR Food United Nations A/HRC/40/56/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 18 December 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Fortieth UHRIA/HRC/40/56/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0ce839fb-8470-4a6c-abce-7f5be5972f1e
VLAD v. Romania
VLAD v. Romania ROU 26/02/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: 1 These cases concern the excessive length of civil Nicolau group and criminal proceedings Stoianova and Nedelcu group and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13259
VLADIMIR KHARITONOV v. Russia
VLADIMIR KHARITONOV v. Russia RUS 16/11/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: The Vladimir Kharitonov group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression Article 10 on account of different types of blocking EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56325
VOLODINA v. Russia
VOLODINA v. Russia RUS 04/11/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54227
VOLODINA v. Russia (no. 2)
VOLODINA v. Russia no. 2 RUS 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59319
Vakoumé et al. v. France
Vakoum et al. v. France CCPR/C/70/D/822/1998 Communication number s : 822/1998 Author: Mathieu Vakoum and 28 other persons Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country France Submission date 11 Mar 1998 Date of decision 31 Oct 2000 JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/822/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/910/en-US
Varela Nunez v. Uruguay
Varela Nunez v. Uruguay CCPR/C/19/D/108/1981 Communication number s : 108/1981 Author: Carlos Varela Nunez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 19 Country Uruguay Submission date 27 Oct 1981 Date of decision 22 Jul 1983 Comment: Mr. Walter JUTBCCPR/C/19/D/108/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/312/en-US
Vargas Vargas v. Chile
Vargas Vargas v. Chile CCPR/C/66/D/718/1996/Rev.1 Communication number s : 718/1996 Author: Maria Otilia Vargas Vargas Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Chile Submission date 03 May 1996 Date of decision 26 Jul 1999 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/718/1996/Rev.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/796/en-US
Viktor Taran v. Ukraine
Viktor Taran v. Ukraine CCPR/C/128/D/2368/2014 Communication number s : 2368/2014 Author: Viktor Taran Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Ukraine Submission date 28 Jul 2011 Date of decision 12 Mar 2020 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2368/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2824/en-US
Voronkov v. Russian Federation
Voronkov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/136/D/2951/2017 Communication number s : 2951/2017 Author: Dmitry Voronkov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Jan 2017 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2951/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3549/en-US
Vuolanne v. Finland
Vuolanne v. Finland CCPR/C/35/D/265/1987 Communication number s : 265/1987 Author: Antti Vuolanne Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Finland Submission date 31 Oct 1987 Date of decision 07 Apr 1989 Comment: Response of the JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/265/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/637/en-US
W.E.O. v. Sweden
W.E.O. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016 Communication number s : 2741/2016 Author: W.E.O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2844/en-US
W.M.G. v. Canada
W.M.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011 Communication number s : 2060/2011 Author: W.M.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date 10 May 2011 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3538/en-US
Wackenheim v. France
Wackenheim v. France CCPR/C/75/D/854/1999 Communication number s : 854/1999 Author: Manuel Wackenheim Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 13 Nov 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/854/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1010/en-US
Warda Osman Jasin v. Denmark
Warda Osman Jasin v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2360/2014 Communication number s : 2360/2014 Author: Warda Osman Jasin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Mar 2014 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2360/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2022/en-US
Warsame v. Canada
Warsame v. Canada CCPR/C/102/D/1959/2010 Communication number s : 1959/2010 Author: Jama Warsame Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 102 Country Canada Submission date 26 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2011 Comment: On 27 July 2010 the JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1959/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1639/en-US
Weiss v. Austria
Weiss v. Austria CCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002 Communication number s : 1086/2002 Author: Sholam Weiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Austria Submission date 24 May 2002 Date of decision 03 Apr 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of its rules JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1048/en-US
Weiss v. Austria
Weiss v. Austria CCPR/C/106/D/1821/2008 Communication number s : 1821/2008 Author: Sholam Weiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Austria Submission date 12 May 2008 Date of decision 24 Oct 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 91 of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1821/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1428/en-US
Winata and Li v. Australia
Winata and Li v. Australia CCPR/C/72/D/930/2000 Communication number s : 930/2000 Author: Hendrick Winata and So Lan Li Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 11 May 2000 Date of decision 26 Jul 2001 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/930/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/929/en-US