Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9841 - 9858 of 9858
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.3 from 14 May 2007 to 18 May 2007 8 January 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Fiji UNITED NATIONS A General UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.2 from 12 October 2015 to 16 October 2015 8 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Belgium United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia CCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018 Communication number s : 3254/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Latvia Submission date 02 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3494/en-US
XENIDES-ARESTIS v. Turkey
XENIDES ARESTIS v. Turkey TUR 22/03/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern the continuous denial of access to property in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37308
Y.B. v. Russian Federation
Y.B. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/110/D/1983/2010 Communication number s : 1983/2010 Author: Y.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Russian Federation Submission date 06 Apr 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1983/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1813/en-US
Yelitze Lisbeth Moreno de Castillo v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Yelitze Lisbeth Moreno de Castillo v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/121/D/2610/2015 Communication number s : 2610/2015 Author: Yelitze Lisbeth Moreno de Castillo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Venezuela Bolivarian JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2610/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2478/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Yusupova v. Russian Federation
Yusupova v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/114/D/2036/2011 Communication number s : 2036/2011 Author: Zinaida Yusupova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Jun 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2036/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1975/en-US
Z.T. v. Norway
Z.T. v. Norway CAT/C/23/D/127/1999 Communication number s : 127/1999 Author: Z.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country Norway Submission date 25 Jan 1998 Date of decision 19 Nov 1999 Comment: Under rule 108 paragraph 9 of the JUTBCAT/C/23/D/127/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/220/en-US
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia CERD/C/55/D/6/1995 Communication number s : 6/1995 Author: Z.U.B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Australia Submission date 17 Jan 1995 Date of decision 26 Dec 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/55/D/6/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3024/en-US
Zafar Abdullayev v. Turkmenistan
Zafar Abdullayev v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/113/D/2218/2012 Communication number s : 2218/2012 Author: Zafar Abdullayev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2218/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1924/en-US
Zhanna Baytelova v. Kazakhstan
Zhanna Baytelova v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/129/D/2520/2015 Communication number s : 2520/2015 Author: Zhanna Baytelova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2015 Date of decision 22 Jul 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2520/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2859/en-US
Zhumbaeva v. Kyrgyzstan
Zhumbaeva v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/102/D/1756/2008 Communication number s : 1756/2008 Author: Turdukan Zhumbaeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 04 Jan 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1756/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1600/en-US
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
Äärelä and Näkkäläjärvi v. Finland
rel and N kk l j rvi v. Finland CCPR/C/73/D/779/1997 Communication number s : 779/1997 Author: Anni rel and Jouni N kk l j rvi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Finland Submission date 04 Nov 1997 Date of decision 24 Oct 2001 JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/779/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/939/en-US
v. Argentina
v. Argentina CAT/C/52/D/366/2008 Communication number s : 366/2008 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Argentina Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/366/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1827/en-US