Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US
Jacobs v. Belgium
Jacobs v. Belgium CCPR/C/81/D/943/2000 Communication number s : 943/2000 Author: Guido Jacobs Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Belgium Submission date 15 Mar 2000 Date of decision 07 Jul 2004 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/943/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1120/en-US
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
Maya Nepal v. Nepal
Maya Nepal v. Nepal CCPR/C/132/D/2615/2015 Communication number s : 2615/2015 Author: Devi Maya Nepal Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Nepal Submission date 24 Mar 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2615/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3187/en-US
N.L. v. Sweden
N.L. v. Sweden CRPD/C/23/D/60/2019 Communication number s : 60/2019 Author: N.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country Sweden Submission date 10 May 2019 Date of decision 28 Aug 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/60/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3073/en-US
Purna Maya v. Nepal
Purna Maya v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013 Communication number s : 2245/2013 Author: Purna Maya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2238/en-US
Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales v. Mexico
Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales v. Mexico CEDAW/C/67/D/75/2014 Communication number s : 075/2014 Author: Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Mexico Submission date 01 JUTBCEDAW/C/67/D/75/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2249/en-US
Román Jaimes v. Mexico
Rom n Jaimes v. Mexico CEDAW/C/83/D/153/2020 Communication number s : 153/2020 Author: Sandra Luz Rom n Jaimes Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Mexico Submission date 18 Oct 2019 Date of decision 24 Oct 2022 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/153/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3556/en-US
S.L. v. Bulgaria
S.L. v. Bulgaria CEDAW/C/73/D/99/2016 Communication number s : 099/2016 Author: S.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Bulgaria Submission date 23 Feb 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/99/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2657/en-US
S.O. v. Canada
S.O. v. Canada CEDAW/C/59/D/49/2013 Communication number s : 049/2013 Author: S.O. represented by counsel William Sloan Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Canada Submission date 21 Feb 2013 Date of decision 27 Oct 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/49/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1881/en-US
S.T. v. Russian Federation
S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Toonen v. Australia
Toonen v. Australia CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 Communication number s : 488/1992 Author: Nicholas Toonen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision 31 Mar 1994 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/50/D/488/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/702/en-US