Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 3236
A. A. C. v. Sweden
A. A. C. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/227/2003 Communication number s : 227/2003 Author: A.A.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Feb 2003 Date of decision 16 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/227/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/112/en-US
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2014 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2425/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2015 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Jan 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2636/en-US
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Alarcón Flores et al v. Ecuador
Alarc n Flores et al v. Ecuador E/C.12/62/D/14/2016 Communication number s : 014/2016 Author: Ana Esther Alarc n Flores et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Ecuador Submission date 05 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Oct 2017 JUTBE/C.12/62/D/14/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2410/en-US
Arenz et al. v. Germany
Arenz et al. v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002 Communication number s : 1138/2002 Author: Paul Arenz Thomas R der and Dagmar R der Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 26 Sep 2002 Date of decision 24 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1062/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
B.K. v. Switzerland
B.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/828/2017 Communication number s : 828/2017 Author: B.K. represented by counsel Ange Sankieme Lusanga Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 05 Jun 2017 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/67/D/828/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2679/en-US
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
Bessis v. France
Bessis v. France CCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018 Communication number s : 3215/2018 Author: Philippe Rudyard Bessis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country France Submission date 26 Oct 2017 Date of decision 13 Oct 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3114/en-US
Bochaton v. France
Bochaton v. France CCPR/C/80/D/1084/2002 Communication number s : 1084/2002 Author: Lionel Bochaton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country France Submission date 11 Apr 2002 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: Under rule 85 of JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1084/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/381/en-US
C.Y. v. Denmark
C.Y. v. Denmark CAT/C/63/D/647/2014 Communication number s : 647/2014 Author: C.Y. represented by counsel Niels Erik Hansen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Dec 2014 Date of decision 17 May 2018 JUTBCAT/C/63/D/647/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2741/en-US
CADE OF A.M.M. v. ITALY
CADE OF A.M.M. v. ITALY 34742/97 ITA 11/28/2002 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list friendly settlement 445 7 40 113 369 304 138 165 609 478 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1128JUD003474297 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A.M.M. v. ITALY Application no. 34742/97 JUDGMENT Friendly ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1128JUD003474297https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60795
CADE OF VIRGULTI v. ITALY
CADE OF VIRGULTI v. ITALY 57206/00 ITA 11/28/2002 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list friendly settlement 445 7 40 113 369 304 138 165 609 478 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1128JUD005720600 FIRST SECTION CASE OF VIRGULTI v. ITALY Application no. 57206/00 JUDGMENT ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1128JUD005720600https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60796
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO 37571/05 RADULOVIC P. MNE 3/5/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Possessions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305JUD003757105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116972
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY 9042/04 BERGE H. NOR 5/31/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD000904204 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY Application no. 9042/04 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 31 May 2007 FINAL ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD000904204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80744
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY (No. 2)
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY No. 2 16468/05 AABO EVENSEN O. K. NOR 1/17/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117JUD001646805 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY No. 2 Application no. 16468/05 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117JUD001646805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-84471