Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 9716
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
ALEXE v. Romania
ALEXE v. Romania ROU 03/08/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of an adversarial trial in civil proceedings due to the fact that the last instance court based its decision on a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12728
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANDREJEVA v. Latvia
ANDREJEVA v. Latvia LVA 18/02/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Discrimination in conjunction with the right to property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal of authorities to take the applicant s years of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12614
ANNONI DI GUSSOLA AND OTHERS v. France
ANNONI DI GUSSOLA AND OTHERS v. France FRA 14/02/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the Court of Cassation President s decision under a specific provision of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33009
ANNUNZIATA v. Italy
ANNUNZIATA v. Italy ITA 06/11/2009 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unlawful interference due to arbitrary monitoring of prisoners correspondence based on a lack of a clear legal framework. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44685
ARNARSSON v. Iceland
ARNARSSON v. Iceland ISL 15/10/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing in criminal matters in that the Supreme Court based the final conviction given on appeal solely on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61
ATUTXA MENDIOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain
ATUTXA MENDIOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain ESP 13/09/2017 00:00:00 27/09/2017 10:04:06 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicants conviction by the Supreme Court departing from the trial judgment which had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47733
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012 Communication number s : 2175/2012 Author: Adelaida Kim Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 05 Feb 2009 Date of decision 04 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2483/en-US
B.J. v. Denmark
B.J. v. Denmark CERD/C/56/D/17/1999 Communication number s : 17/1999 Author: B.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Denmark Submission date 13 Jul 1999 Date of decision 17 Mar 2000 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/56/D/17/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3026/en-US
B.V. v. Belgium
B.V. v. Belgium BEL 02/08/2017 00:00:00 11/09/2017 09:42:58 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of serious and thorough investigations carried after the applicant had lodged a criminal complaint alleging rape and indecent assault. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47595
BALSYTE-LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania
BALSYTE LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania LTU 04/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the inability in administrative proceedings to question the experts on whose expert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4213
BALTAJI v. Bulgaria
BALTAJI v. Bulgaria BGR 12/10/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Expulsion / deportation Protection of private life and lack of effective remedy lack of procedural safeguards against expulsion: Arbitrariness in expulsion proceedings based EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4017
BARANOWSKI v. Poland
BARANOWSKI v. Poland POL 28/03/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention on remand on the sole basis of a bill of indictment beyond the period set in the detention order and delayed decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17781
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 11/01/2017 00:00:00 26/04/2017 16:15:53 Case Description: This group concerns lengthy expropriation proceedings hindering the use of the property in question. Barcza: Violation of the right to protection of property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46703
BASENKO v. Ukraine
BASENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/02/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and effective remedy: Ill treatment of the applicants by State agents a public transport employee and two volunteer citizen guards and lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32270
BAYTAR v. Turkey
BAYTAR v. Turkey TUR 14/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicant s conviction partly based on statements obtained without the assistance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37330