Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2014 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2425/en-US
H.D. v. Denmark
H.D. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/70/D/76/2014 Communication number s : 076/2014 Author: H.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 09 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/70/D/76/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2424/en-US
N.L. v. Sweden
N.L. v. Sweden CRPD/C/23/D/60/2019 Communication number s : 60/2019 Author: N.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country Sweden Submission date 10 May 2019 Date of decision 28 Aug 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/60/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3073/en-US
N.Q. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
N.Q. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/63/D/62/2013 Communication number s : 62/2013 Author: N.Q. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Submission date JUTBCEDAW/C/63/D/62/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3029/en-US
S.F.A. v. Denmark
S.F.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015 Communication number s : 085/2015 Author: S.F.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2427/en-US
S.J.A. v. Denmark
S.J.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/68/D/79/2014 Communication number s : 079/2014 Author: S.J.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 06 Nov 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/68/D/79/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2423/en-US