Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 4456
A/HRC/47/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Lebanon
United Nations A/HRC/47/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc475-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-lebanon
A.K. et al. v. Albania
A.K. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/127/D/2438/2014 Communication number s : 2438/2014 Author: A.K. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Albania Submission date 04 Jul 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2438/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2890/en-US
A.M. v. Italy
A.M. v. Italy ITA 14/03/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicant s conviction on the basis of testimony obtained in the US before trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43007
A.N.A. v. Denmark
A.N.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015 Communication number s : 094/2015 Author: A.N.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Sep 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2656/en-US
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
A.P.J. v. Denmark
A.P.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013 Communication number s : 2253/2013 Author: A.P.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2013 Date of decision 16 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2266/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A. R. A. v. Sweden
A. R. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/38/D/305/2006 Communication number s : 305/2006 Author: A. R. A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 38 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 30 Apr 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/38/D/305/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/100/en-US
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark,Italy
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark Italy CCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014 Communication number s : 2378/2014 Author: A.S.M. and R.A.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Italy Submission date 14 Apr 2014 Date of decision 07 Jul 2016 JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2245/en-US
A decency threshold for prisons – criteria for assessing conditions of detention
A decency threshold for prisons criteria for assessing conditions of detention fcn fk fkm fkmh fkmv fkrg fmpm ftb 2021 05 06 2018 04 19 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT CPT/Inf 2021 5 CPTCPT/Inf(2021)5-parthttps://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2021-5-part-en
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
ADEM ARSLAN v. Turkey
ADEM ARSLAN v. Turkey TUR 19/03/2007 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings due to the failure to hold hearings in cases in which small fines were adopted by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5556
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 14 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/df44459f-375a-4034-b0d5-fafc9b172d4d
AJDARIC v. Croatia
AJDARIC v. Croatia HRV 04/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial conviction of a Bosnian national for murder solely on the basis of hearsay evidence and contradictory EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12331
ALBINA v. Romania
ALBINA v. Romania ROU 28/07/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings for recovery of property nationalised during the communist regime as the court of last instance failed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16125
AMIRKHANYAN v. Armenia
AMIRKHANYAN v. Armenia ARM 03/03/2016 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Violation of the principle of res judicata finality of judgments following second appeals on points of law without any EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-369
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANDORRA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ANDORRA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/AND/CO/1 6 NULL 2019 05 22T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/AND/CO/1 6 International Convention on Distr.: General 22 May 2019 the Elimination of All Forms English of Racial Discrimination Original: French UHRICERD/C/AND/CO/1-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/43783802-adee-4862-8fc8-0ce80e15d3b4
ANDRE v. France
ANDRE v. France FRA 28/05/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial before the Cour de Cassation due to the failure to communicate the report of the reporting judge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32745