Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1001 - 1009 of 1009
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.2 from 12 October 2015 to 16 October 2015 8 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Belgium United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/27/50/Add.1 from 7 May 2014 to 16 May 2014 4 August 2014 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Comoros United Nations UNSPA/HRC/27/50/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f27%2f50%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/24/45/Add.2 from 8 December 2012 to 14 December 2012 1 July 2013 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Somalia United UNSPA/HRC/24/45/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f24%2f45%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
Y.B.F., S.A.Q. and Y.Y. v. Switzerland
Y.B.F. S.A.Q. and Y.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/50/D/467/2011 Communication number s : 467/2011 Author: Y.B.F. S.A.Q. and Y.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 31 May 2013 JUTBCAT/C/50/D/467/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3/en-US
Z v. Australia
Z v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/802/2017 Communication number s : 802/2017 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 01 Feb 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/802/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3368/en-US
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato (UNADIS) v. Italy, Complaint No. 147/2017
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato UNADIS v. Italy Complaint No. 147/2017 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 01 04 000 04 01 000 04 04 000 05 00 000 06 04 000 24 00 163 91 00 163 2021 06 30 2021 11 10 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-147-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-147-2017-dmerits-en
v. Switzerland
v. Switzerland CAT/C/26/D/147/1999 Communication number s : 147/1999 Author: Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 26 Country Switzerland Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues JUTBCAT/C/26/D/147/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1769/en-US