Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 89
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY 30254/18 ANDRESEN K.S.S. NOR 3/24/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003025418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216348
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF COSTA AND PAVAN v. ITALY
CASE OF COSTA AND PAVAN v. ITALY 54270/10 PAOLETTI N. ITA 8/28/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Non pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0828JUD005427010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112993
CASE OF DARBOE AND CAMARA v. ITALY
CASE OF DARBOE AND CAMARA v. ITALY 5797/17 FERRERO M. CHIARETTO E. ITA 7/21/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Art. 37 1 c Continued examination not justified Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0721JUD000579717https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-218424
CASE OF EKEBERG AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF EKEBERG AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 11106/04 11108/04 11116/04 11311/04 13276/04 NAESS S. NOR 7/31/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 one applicant No violation of Art. 6 1 other applicants No violation of Art. 6 1 Section 108 of the Administration ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0731JUD001110604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-81994
CASE OF EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6339/05 LYONS M. GBR 4/10/2007 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 and Schedule 3 Human Fertilisation and Embryology ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410JUD000633905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80046
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA I 13255/07 MESKHORADZE L. RUS 7/3/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0703JUD001325507https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145546
CASE OF KURT v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF KURT v. AUSTRIA 62903/15 KOLBITSCH K. AZIZ S. AUT 6/15/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0615JUD006290315https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210463
CASE OF LAUTSI AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF LAUTSI AND OTHERS v. ITALY 30814/06 PAOLETTI N. ITA 3/18/2011 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 2 573 428 427 238 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0318JUD003081406 GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF LAUTSI AND OTHERS v. ITALY Application no. 30814/06 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0318JUD003081406https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-104040
CASE OF MIHALACHE v. ROMANIA
CASE OF MIHALACHE v. ROMANIA 54012/10 BRATU M. ROU 7/8/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Reopening of case Fundamental defect in proceedings Conviction ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0708JUD005401210https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194523
CASE OF VILNES AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF VILNES AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 52806/09 22703/10 LUDVIGSEN E. JOHNSRUD E. HELLUM LILLEENGEN K. BENTSEN H. NOR 12/5/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD005280609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138597
Calleja Loma and Calleja Lucas v. Spain
Calleja Loma and Calleja Lucas v. Spain CRPD/C/23/D/41/2017 Communication number s : 41/2017 Author: Rub n Calleja Loma and Alejandro Calleja Lucas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country Spain Submission date 02 May 2017 Date of JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/41/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3072/en-US
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Latvia
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Latvia LVA GVT/COM/I 2009 001 Strasbourg 30 March 2011 Public GVT/COM/I 2009 001 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF FCNMGVT/COM/I(2009)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_Com_Latvia_en
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Poland
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Poland POL GVT/COM/IV 2020 002 GVT/COM/IV 2020 002 Comments of the Government of Poland on the Fourth Opinion of the Advisory Committee on the implementation of the Framework Convention for the FCNMGVT/COM/IV(2020)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_COM_Poland_EN
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on the Russian Federation
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on the Russian Federation RUS GVT/COM/IV 2018 006 GVT/COM/IV 2018 006 Comments of the Government of the Russian Federation on the Fourth Opinion of the Advisory Committee on the implementation of the FCNMGVT/COM/IV(2018)006https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Com_Russianfederation_en
Conclusions 2020 - Estonia - Article 20
Conclusions 2020 Estonia Article 20 EST 20 00 000 29/01/2021 02/02/2021 Article 20 Right to equal opportunities and equal treatment in matters of employment and occupation without discrimination on the grounds of sex The Committee takes note of the ESC2020/def/EST/20/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2020/def/EST/20/EN
Conclusions XII-1 - Norway - Article 6-4
Conclusions XII 1 Norway Article 6 4 NOR 06 04 000 30/09/1991 30/09/1991 Article 6 Right to bargain collectively Paragraph 4 Collective action The Committee noted that during the reference period the Norwegian Government had intervened to bring to an end ESCXII-1/def/NOR/6/4/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XII-1/def/NOR/6/4/EN
Decision on the merits: Associazione Professionale e Sindacale (ANIEF) v. Italy, Complaint No. 159/2018
Decision on the merits: Associazione Professionale e Sindacale ANIEF v. Italy Complaint No. 159/2018 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 04 01 000 04 04 000 05 00 000 06 04 000 24 00 163 91 101 163 91 102 163 91 119 163 91 124 163 91 129 163 91 201 163 2022 03 22 ESCcc-159-2018-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-159-2018-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: European European Youth Forum (YFJ) v. Belgium, Complaint No. 150/2017
Decision on the merits: European European Youth Forum YFJ v. Belgium Complaint No. 150/2017 BEL 04 01 000 91 119 163 2021 09 08 2022 02 16 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 8 September ESCcc-150-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-150-2017-dmerits-en
Eleventh Activity Report (2016-2018)
Eleventh Activity Report 2016 2018 ACFC/INF 2018 001 2018 05 31 2018 10 01 Strasbourg 31 May 2018 Restricted ACFC/INF 2018 001 Eleventh activity report covering the period 1 June 2016 31 May 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE ADVISORY FCNMACFC/INF (2018)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=11th_Activity_Report_2016_2018