Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 24
A.K. et al. v. Australia
A.K. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014 Communication number s : 2365/2014 Author: A.K. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Australia Submission date 13 Mar 2014 Date of decision 08 Jul 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3109/en-US
CASE OF ILHAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF ILHAN v. TURKEY 22277/93 N/A TUR 6/27/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed victim Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion No violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage financial award Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0627JUD002227793https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58734
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL 56080/13 S FERNANDES R. PRT 12/19/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 21825/93 23414/94 N/A GBR 6/9/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 445 7 310 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002182593https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58175
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (REVISION)
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM REVISION 21825/93 23414/94 N/A GBR 1/28/2000 12:00:00 AM Revision rejected Pensions Appeal Tribunals Scotland Rules 1981 Rule 6 445 13 7 136 451 429 444 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0128JUD002182593 FIRST SECTION CASE ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0128JUD002182593https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58452
CASE OF ROCHE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ROCHE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 32555/96 WELCH J. GBR 10/19/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 14 6 or 14 P1 1 No violation of Art. 13 6 or 13 P1 1 Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 10 Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1019JUD003255596https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-70662
Cayzer v. Australia
Cayzer v. Australia CCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017 Communication number s : 2981/2017 Author: Graham Cayzer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Australia Submission date 13 Jul 2016 Date of decision 25 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3676/en-US
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (ETS No. 127)
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters ETS No. 127 127 Strasbourg 1988 01 25T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and the Member countries of OECD and in its version amended by the 2010 COEETS No. 127https://rm.coe.int/16806a42b0
D.S. v. Australia
D.S. v. Australia CAT/C/73/D/941/2019 Communication number s : 941/2019 Author: D.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Australia Submission date 12 Jul 2019 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/941/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3137/en-US
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
G.E. v. Australia
G.E. v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/725/2016 Communication number s : 725/2016 Author: G.E. represented by D.N. counsellor/social worker at Companion House Assisting Survivors of Torture and Trauma Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/725/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2282/en-US
I.P.W.F. v. Australia
I.P.W.F. v. Australia CAT/C/63/D/618/2014 Communication number s : 618/2014 Author: I.P.W.F. represented by counsel John Phillip Sweeney Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Australia Submission date 23 May 2014 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/63/D/618/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2733/en-US
K.V. v. Australia
K.V. v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/600/2014 Communication number s : 600/2014 Author: K.V. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 25 Apr 2014 Date of decision 11 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/600/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2218/en-US
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012 Communication number s : 2136/2012 Author: M.M.M. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision Comment: The text of an individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1674/en-US
Nasir v. Australia
Nasir v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012 Communication number s : 2229/2012 Author: Nasir Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2012 Date of decision 29 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3091/en-US
P.V. v. Australia
P.V. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/708/2015 Communication number s : 708/2015 Author: P.V. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 20 Oct 2015 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/708/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3427/en-US
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON ADEQUATE HOUSING AS A COMPONENT OF THE RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE STANDARD OF LIVING, MILOON KOTHARI : ADDENDUM
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON ADEQUATE HOUSING AS A COMPONENT OF THE RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE STANDARD OF LIVING MILOON KOTHARI : ADDENDUM A/HRC/4/18/Add.2 NULL 2007 05 11T06:00:00 SR Housing UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly UHRIA/HRC/4/18/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f18b8e41-15bd-4bf9-a184-713ff4c8f91c
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : KIRIBATI
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : KIRIBATI A/HRC/44/15 NULL 2020 03 23T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/44/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 March 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty fourth session 15 June UHRIA/HRC/44/15https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f2f54e0e-8167-45a3-bee0-60b144a76117
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Kiribati
United Nations A/HRC/44/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 March 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty fourth session 15 June 3 July 2020 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/44/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-kiribati
S.S. v. Australia
S.S. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/648/2015 Communication number s : 648/2015 Author: S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 14 Oct 2014 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/648/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3430/en-US