Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5321 - 5340 of 5534
Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/68/Add.2 from 31 May 1998 to 18 June 1998 4 January 1999 Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences United States of America UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council UNSPE/CN.4/1999/68/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f68%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2002/106/Add.1 from 30 July 2001 to 4 August 2001 12 March 2002 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders Kyrgyzstan E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2002/106/Add.1 12 UNSPE/CN.4/2002/106/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2002%2f106%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 from 10 October 2004 to 21 October 2004 16 March 2005 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders T rkiye UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 UNSPE/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2005%2f101%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Statement on the Russian aggression against Ukraine
Statement on the Russian aggression against Ukraine RUS ACFC/STA/2022/1 2022 05 20 2022 05 23 20 May 2022 Statement of the Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities on the Russian aggression against Ukraine FCNMACFC/STA/2022/1https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=Statement_Russian_aggression_against_Ukraine
Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar v. Australia
Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/614/2014 Communication number s : 614/2014 Author: Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar represented by counsel Robert James de Vere McCaw Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/614/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2254/en-US
Supplementary Agreement for the Application of the European Convention on Social Security (ETS No. 078A)
Supplementary Agreement for the Application of the European Convention on Social Security ETS No. 078A 078A Paris 1972 12 14T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 78 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 078Ahttps://rm.coe.int/1680074619
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia CAT/C/68/D/855/2017 Communication number s : 855/2017 Author: Susith Wasitha Ranawaka represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Australia Submission date 20 Nov JUTBCAT/C/68/D/855/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2699/en-US
Szijjarto v. Hungary
Szijjarto v. Hungary CEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004 Communication number s : 004/2004 Author: Andrea Szijjarto Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Hungary Submission date 12 Feb 2004 Date of decision 14 Aug 2006 Comment: Under rule 60 1 c of JUTBCEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1716/en-US
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.B. v. Switzerland
T.B. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/862/2018 Communication number s : 862/2018 Author: T.B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Feb 2018 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/862/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3139/en-US
T.K.T. v. Switzerland
T.K.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/866/2018 Communication number s : 866/2018 Author: T.K.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Mar 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/866/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3373/en-US
T.M. v. Greece
T.M. v. Greece CRPD/C/21/D/42/2017 Communication number s : 042/2017 Author: T.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 21 Country Greece Submission date 21 Mar 2017 Date of decision 02 Apr 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/21/D/42/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2516/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.S. v. Netherlands
T.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/71/D/896/2018 Communication number s : 896/2018 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Nov 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/896/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3374/en-US
T.Z. v. Switzerland
T.Z. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/688/2015 Communication number s : 688/2015 Author: T.Z. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 07 Jul 2015 Date of decision 22 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/688/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2334/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US
THLIMMENOS v. Greece
THLIMMENOS v. Greece GRC 06/04/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Discrimination on religious grounds / access to and effective functioning of justice: Discriminatory treatment of the applicant due to the authorities refusal to appoint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22168
Tadman et al. v. Canada
Tadman et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/67/D/816/1998 Communication number s : 816/1998 Author: Grant Tadman et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 11 Apr 1997 Date of decision 29 Oct 1999 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/816/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/835/en-US
Tatyana Yachnik v. Belarus
Tatyana Yachnik v. Belarus CCPR/C/111/D/1990/2010 Communication number s : 1990/2010 Author: Tatyana Yachnik Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Belarus Submission date 10 Jun 2009 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1990/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1855/en-US
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines CEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008 Communication number s : 018/2008 Author: Karen Tayag Vertido Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Philippines Submission date 29 Nov 2007 Date of decision 16 Jul 2010 Comment: The JUTBCEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1700/en-US