Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9
CASE OF AKDİVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKD VAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 21893/93 N/A TUR 9/16/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0916JUD002189393https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58062
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF HUVIG v. FRANCE
CASE OF HUVIG v. FRANCE 11105/84 N/A FRA 4/24/1990 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Just satisfaction not applied Criminal Code Article 368 Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 81 151 and 152 451 203 319 424 429 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0424JUD001110584 COURT ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0424JUD001110584https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57627
CASE OF KHAMIDOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMIDOV v. RUSSIA 72118/01 PETROSYAN M. RUS 11/15/2007 12:00:00 AM Violations of Art. 8 Violations of P1 1 Violations of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1115JUD007211801https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83273
CASE OF KRUSLIN v. FRANCE
CASE OF KRUSLIN v. FRANCE 11801/85 N/A FRA 4/24/1990 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Criminal Code Article 368 Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 81 151 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0424JUD001180185https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57626
CASE OF MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8691/79 N/A GBR 8/2/1984 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just satisfaction reserved Post Office Act 1969 Section 80 451 429 424 203 319 268 329 333 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0802JUD000869179https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57533
CASE OF MURRAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF MURRAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 14310/88 N/A GBR 10/28/1994 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 2 No violation of Art. 5 5 No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 13 1978 Northern Ireland Emergency Provisions Act Sections ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1028JUD001431088https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57895
CASE OF ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA 47143/06 GRUZD B. NGO EHRAC / Memorial Human Rights Centre RUS 12/4/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Actio popularis Victim Preliminary objection joined to merits and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1204JUD004714306https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159324
CASE OF SHIMOVOLOS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF SHIMOVOLOS v. RUSSIA 30194/09 N/A RUS 6/21/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Articles 27.2 1 1 2 and 3 27.3 1 25.5 1 and 27.4 of the Administrative Offences Code 451 429 203 319 557 556 448 220 93 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD003019409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105217