Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 876
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
A.M.M. v. Switzerland
A.M.M. v. Switzerland CERD/C/84/D/50/2012 Communication number s : 050/2012 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jan 2012 Date of decision 18 Feb 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/84/D/50/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1799/en-US
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015 Communication number s : 2567/2015 Author: A.U. and H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country New Zealand Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2233/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014 Communication number s : 2483/2014 Author: Vladimir Adyrkhayev Behruz Solikhov and the Religious Association of Jehovah s Witnesses in Dushanb Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3555/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
Althammer et al. (2) v. Austria
Althammer et al. 2 v. Austria CCPR/C/78/D/998/2001 Communication number s : 998/2001 Author: Rupert Althammer et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Austria Submission date 22 Apr 1998 Date of decision 08 Aug 2003 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/998/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1054/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal CCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009 Communication number s : 1863/2009 Author: Dev Bahadur Maharjan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Dec 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1238/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA 48442/16 48831/16 DRAGOMIR D. E. ROU 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202621
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28680/06 MOLE N. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 8 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage award Section 23 6 of the Children Act 1989 238 354 444 110 451 268 376 425 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD002868006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97636
CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 47220/19 GLUSHKOVA T. KHAYMOVICH D. RUS 7/6/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD004722019https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210878
CASE OF A.N. v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF A.N. v. LITHUANIA 17280/08 GZIMAILA V. LTU 5/31/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531JUD001728008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163344