Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1881 - 1896 of 1896
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/53/24/Add.2 from 1 December 2022 to 9 December 2022 19 May 2023 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Luxembourg United Nations A/HRC/53/24/Add.2 General Assembly UNSPA/HRC/53/24/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f53%2f24%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/35/32/Add.2 from 29 August 2016 to 7 September 2016 27 April 2017 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Mexico United Nations A/HRC/35/32/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: UNSPA/HRC/35/32/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f35%2f32%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/18/32/Add.3 from 10 November 2010 to 19 November 2010 4 July 2011 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination South Africa United UNSPA/HRC/18/32/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f18%2f32%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/18/32/Add.4 from 12 June 2011 to 16 June 2011 12 August 2011 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Iraq United Nations UNSPA/HRC/18/32/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f18%2f32%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Wright v. Jamaica
Wright v. Jamaica CCPR/C/45/D/349/1989 Communication number s : 349/1989 Author: Clifton Wright Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Jamaica Submission date 12 Jan 1989 Date of decision 27 Jul 1992 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/349/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/423/en-US
X. H. L. v. Netherlands
X. H. L. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/102/D/1564/2007 Communication number s : 1564/2007 Author: X. H. L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Jan 2007 Date of decision 22 Jul 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1564/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1507/en-US
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X v. Russian Federation
X v. Russian Federation CAT/C/54/D/542/2013 Communication number s : 542/2013 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Russian Federation Submission date 04 Feb 2013 Date of decision 08 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/54/D/542/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1955/en-US
XENIDES-ARESTIS v. Turkey
XENIDES ARESTIS v. Turkey TUR 22/03/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern the continuous denial of access to property in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37308
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/88/D/1321 1322/2004 Communication number s : 1322/2004 1321/2004 Author: Yeo Bum Yoon and Myung Jin Choi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 18 Oct 2004 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1321-1322/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1323/en-US
Zalesskaya v. Belarus
Zalesskaya v. Belarus CCPR/C/101/D/1604/2007 Communication number s : 1604/2007 Author: Elena Zalesskaya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Belarus Submission date 08 Feb 2007 Date of decision 28 Mar 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1604/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1636/en-US
Zhen Zhen Zheng v. Netherlands
Zhen Zhen Zheng v. Netherlands CEDAW/C/42/D/15/2007 Communication number s : 015/2007 Author: Zhen Zhen Zheng Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 42 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Jan 2007 Date of decision 27 Oct 2008 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/42/D/15/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1708/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC