Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 961 - 980 of 1954
N.Q. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
N.Q. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/63/D/62/2013 Communication number s : 62/2013 Author: N.Q. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Submission date JUTBCEDAW/C/63/D/62/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3029/en-US
N.S.F. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
N.S.F. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/38/D/10/2005 Communication number s : 010/2005 Author: N.S.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 38 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/38/D/10/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1714/en-US
N.S. v. Canada
N.S. v. Canada CAT/C/59/D/582/2014 Communication number s : 582/2014 Author: N.S. represented by counsel Rajwinder Singh Bhambi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Canada Submission date 11 Jan 2014 Date of decision 01 Dec 2016 JUTBCAT/C/59/D/582/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2212/en-US
N. v. Netherlands
N. v. Netherlands CEDAW/C/57/D/39/2012 Communication number s : 039/2012 Author: N. represented by counsel Ilse van Kuilenburg Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 57 Country Netherlands Submission date 16 Feb 2012 Date of decision 17 Feb JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/39/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1877/en-US
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/133/D/2904/2016 Communication number s : 2904/2016 2907/2016 Author: Ermek Narymbaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 07 Oct 2016 Date of decision 20 Oct 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2904/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3160/en-US
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2521/2015 Communication number s : 2521/2015 Author: Ermek Narymbaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2521/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3267/en-US
Nikolaus Fürst Blücher von Wahlstatt v. Czech Republic
Nikolaus F rst Bl cher von Wahlstatt v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/99/D/1491/2006 Communication number s : 1491/2006 Author: Nikolaus F rst Bl cher von Wahlstatt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Czech Republic Submission date 07 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1491/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1571/en-US
Nurlanuly v. Kazakhstan
Nurlanuly v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2546/2015 Communication number s : 2546/2015 Author: Damir Nurlanuly Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2546/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3255/en-US
O.H.C. and J.O.C. v. Colombia
O.H.C. and J.O.C. v. Colombia CCPR/C/43/D/287/1988 Communication number s : 287/1988 Author: O.H.C. name deleted on his own behalf and on behalf of his brother Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country Colombia Submission date 18 JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/287/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/636/en-US
O.H.D., O.A.D. and B.O.M. v. Australia
O.H.D. O.A.D. and B.O.M. v. Australia CCPR/C/134/D/3023/2017 Communication number s : 3023/2017 Author: O.H.D. O.A.D. and B.O.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Australia Submission date 06 Sep 2017 Date of decision 25 JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3023/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3140/en-US
O.K. v. Latvia
O.K. v. Latvia CCPR/C/110/D/1935/2010 Communication number s : 1935/2010 Author: O.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Latvia Submission date 13 Nov 2009 Date of decision 19 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1935/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1810/en-US
O'Neill and Quinn v. Canada,Ireland
O Neill and Quinn v. Canada Ireland CCPR/C/87/D/1314/2004 Communication number s : 1314/2004 Author: Michael O Neill and John Quinn Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Canada Ireland Submission date 14 Sep 2004 Date of decision 24 JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1314/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1297/en-US
O.V.J. v. Denmark
O.V.J. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/61/D/50/2013 Communication number s : 050/2013 Author: O.V.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 61 Country Denmark Submission date 24 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/50/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2054/en-US
Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the Implementation of the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/38/27 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 April 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty eighth session 18 June 6 July 2018 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/38/27https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-financial-and-technical-assistance-implementation-1
Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the Implementation of the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/35/18 General Assembly Distr.: General 13 April 2017 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty fifth session 6 23 June 2017 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of UPRA/HRC/35/18https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-financial-and-technical-assistance-implementation-2
Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the implementation of the universal periodic review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/44/19 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 April 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty fourth session 15 June 3 July 2020 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/44/19https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-financial-and-technical-assistance-implementation-0
Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the implementation of the universal periodic review - Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/41/29 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 May 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty first session 24 June 12 July 2019 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports UPRA/HRC/41/29https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-financial-and-technical-assistance-implementation
Operations of the Voluntary Fund for participation in the universal periodic review - Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/41/28 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 May 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty first session 24 June 12 July 2019 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports UPRA/HRC/41/28https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-participation-universal-periodic-review-report-united
Ortikov v. Uzbekistan
Ortikov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/118/D/2317/2013 Communication number s : 2317/2013 Author: Kayum Ortikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 14 Jul 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2317/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2145/en-US
P.H.A. v. Denmark
P.H.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/65/D/61/2013 Communication number s : 61/2013 Author: P.H.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Sep 2013 Date of decision 07 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/65/D/61/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3453/en-US