Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1817
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark,Italy
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark Italy CCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014 Communication number s : 2378/2014 Author: A.S.M. and R.A.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Italy Submission date 14 Apr 2014 Date of decision 07 Jul 2016 JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2245/en-US
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 NULL 2013 08 05T00:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3da0110e-6a50-4290-bd4f-20e5594b1e7b
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012 Communication number s : 2175/2012 Author: Adelaida Kim Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 05 Feb 2009 Date of decision 04 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2483/en-US
Anton v. Algeria
Anton v. Algeria CCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005 Communication number s : 1424/2005 Author: Armand Anton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Nov 2004 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1324/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
BUSINESS SI INVESTITII PENTRU TOTI v. the Republic of Moldova
BUSINESS SI INVESTITII PENTRU TOTI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/01/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Group of cases concerning the violation of the applicants right to access to a court due to the domestic courts failure to consider EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7001
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Bayush Alemseged Araya v. Denmark
Bayush Alemseged Araya v. Denmark CCPR/C/123/D/2575/2015 Communication number s : 2575/2015 Author: Bayush Alemseged Araya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Denmark Submission date 24 Feb 2015 Date of decision 13 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2575/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2544/en-US
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA 48442/16 48831/16 DRAGOMIR D. E. ROU 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202621
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS 37328/97 N/A NLD 1/29/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 in respect of control of correspondence with the Commission and with lawyer No violation of Art. 8 in respect of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003732897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60019
CASE OF A.S.N. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.S.N. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS 68377/17 530/18 VAN HAREN F.L.M. NLD 2/25/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Afghanistan 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD006837717 FOURTH ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD006837717https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201330
CASE OF AÏT-MOUHOUB v. FRANCE
CASE OF A T MOUHOUB v. FRANCE 22924/93 N/A FRA 10/28/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 as regards first complaint Violation of Art. 6 1 as regards second complaint Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002292493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58259
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25599/94 N/A GBR 9/23/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002559994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58232
CASE OF AB KURT KELLERMANN v. SWEDEN
CASE OF AB KURT KELLERMANN v. SWEDEN 41579/98 TILLQVIST J. LINDOW A. SWE 10/26/2004 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Litigation in Labour Disputes Act 1974 sections 1 2 3 and 6 445 40 180 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1026JUD004157998 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF AB ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1026JUD004157998https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-67220
CASE OF ABAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ABAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 37542/05 EHRAC/MEMORIAL HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE RUS 4/8/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 13 449 350 448 444 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0408JUD003754205 FIRST SECTION ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0408JUD003754205https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98179