Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 42
CASE OF AGROKOMPLEKS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF AGROKOMPLEKS v. UKRAINE 23465/03 LUCAS P. Y. UKR 10/6/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed applicability Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 6 1 Violation of P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved 445 40 181 180 136 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1006JUD002346503https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106636
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF BJARKI H. DIEGO v. ICELAND
CASE OF BJARKI H. DIEGO v. ICELAND 30965/17 J L USSON . ISL 3/15/2022 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Impartial tribunal Independent tribunal Violation of Article 6 6 3 Right to a fair ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315JUD003096517https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216184
CASE OF BLESA RODRÍGUEZ v. SPAIN
CASE OF BLESA RODR GUEZ v. SPAIN 61131/12 GOMEZ DE LIANO BOTELLA J. ESP 12/1/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Impartial tribunal 445 76 180 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1201JUD006113112 THIRD ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1201JUD006113112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158950
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 N/A TUR 3/12/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60979
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7819/77 7878/77 N/A GBR 6/28/1984 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 3 b Violation of Art. 6 3 c Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0628JUD000781977https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57456
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND 36661/07 38433/07 KRUSZYNSKI P. SJ CRONA VAN STIGT ATTORNEYS POL 4/12/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0412JUD003666107https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182169
CASE OF COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 48843/99 N/A GBR 12/16/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Air Force Act 1955 as amended by the Armed Forces Act 1996 445 181 180 76 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216JUD004884399 CASE OF COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216JUD004884399https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61549
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY 25781/94 N/A TUR 5/10/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0510JUD002578194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59454
CASE OF DIMITROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF DIMITROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 77938/11 VASILEV V. BGR 7/1/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD007793811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145224
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 19750/13 DAJBYCH J. CZE 6/23/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0623JUD001975013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-217806
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 19750/13 DAJBYCH J. CZE 6/1/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art 35 1 Four month period former six month Inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art 35 1 Four month ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0601JUD001975013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225231
CASE OF HAARDE v. ICELAND
CASE OF HAARDE v. ICELAND 66847/12 ARNASON A. ISL 11/23/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1123JUD006684712https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178700
CASE OF HUSEYN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF HUSEYN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN 35485/05 35680/05 36085/05 45553/05 AGAYEV F. HAJILI R. ALIYEV I. AZE 7/26/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6 1 and 6 3 b ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0726JUD003548505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105823
CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY 10211/12 27505/14 AHMED A. TEGEBAUER I. J. DEU 12/4/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 e Persons of unsound mind No violation of Article 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001021112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187540
CASE OF INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CONSORTIUM INVESTMENT METALLURGICAL UNION v. UKRAINE
CASE OF INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CONSORTIUM INVESTMENT METALLURGICAL UNION v. UKRAINE 10640/05 YASINSKIY V. REYNOLDS J. UKR 6/26/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626JUD001064005https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184068
CASE OF JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND
CASE OF JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND 35599/20 K ADOCZNY P. POL 10/6/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006JUD003559920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219563
CASE OF KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA 9783/82 N/A AUT 12/19/1989 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 14 6 1 and 14 6 3 c Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1219JUD000978382https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57614
CASE OF KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA 11082/06 13772/05 MOSKALENKO K. DREL A. BLAKE N. QC PANNICK D. Lord QC GLASSON J. PEUKERT W. Dr LIPTSER Y. BARU Y. CASSESE A. Prof TOMUSCHAT Ch. Prof RUS 7/25/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0725JUD001108206https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122697