Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5821 - 5840 of 6556
S.M. v. Switzerland
S.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/49/D/406/2009 Communication number s : 406/2009 Author: S.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Nov 2009 Date of decision 23 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/406/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/22/en-US
S. N. A. W. et al. v. Switzerland
S. N. A. W. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/35/D/231/2003 Communication number s : 231/2003 Author: S.N.A.W. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 Jun 2003 Date of decision 24 Nov 2005 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/35/D/231/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/119/en-US
S. P. A. v. Canada
S. P. A. v. Canada CAT/C/37/D/282/2005 Communication number s : 282/2005 Author: S.P.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Canada Submission date 26 Sep 2005 Date of decision 07 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/282/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/107/en-US
S.P. v. Australia
S.P. v. Australia CAT/C/68/D/718/2015 Communication number s : 718/2015 Author: S.P. represented by Companion House Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Australia Submission date 18 Nov 2015 Date of decision 22 Nov 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/718/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2694/en-US
S.R. v. Canada
S.R. v. Canada CAT/C/74/D/973/2019 Communication number s : 973/2019 Author: S.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Canada Submission date 29 Oct 2019 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/74/D/973/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3287/en-US
S.R. v. Lithuania
S.R. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/132/D/3313/2019 Communication number s : 3313/2019 Author: S.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Lithuania Submission date 23 Nov 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3313/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3172/en-US
S.R. v. Netherlands
S.R. v. Netherlands CAT/C/71/D/834/2017 Communication number s : 834/2017 Author: S.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Netherlands Submission date 31 May 2017 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/834/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3359/en-US
S.S.S. v. Canada
S.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/35/D/245/2004 Communication number s : 245/2004 Author: S.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Canada Submission date 24 Feb 2004 Date of decision 16 Nov 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/35/D/245/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/122/en-US
S.S. and P.S. v. Canada
S.S. and P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/62/D/702/2015 Communication number s : 702/2015 Author: S.S. and P.S. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Canada Submission date 04 Oct 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/702/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2402/en-US
S.S. v. Australia
S.S. v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/720/2015 Communication number s : 720/2015 Author: S.S. represented by counsel John Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Australia Submission date 04 Dec 2015 Date of decision 09 Aug 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/61/D/720/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2278/en-US
S.S. v. Australia
S.S. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/648/2015 Communication number s : 648/2015 Author: S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 14 Oct 2014 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/648/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3430/en-US
S.T. v. Australia
S.T. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/716/2015 Communication number s : 716/2015 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 23 Oct 2015 Date of decision 11 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/716/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3463/en-US
S.T. v. Russian Federation
S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US
Sánchez López v. Spain
S nchez L pez v. Spain CCPR/C/67/D/777/1997 Communication number s : 777/1997 Author: Antonio S nchez L pez Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Spain Submission date 22 Oct 1996 Date of decision 18 Oct 1999 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/777/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/848/en-US
S. v. Sweden
S. v. Sweden CAT/C/65/D/691/2015 Communication number s : 691/2015 Author: S. represented by counsel Viktoria Nystrom Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Jun 2015 Date of decision 16 Nov 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/65/D/691/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2467/en-US
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/VCT/CO/2 3 NULL 2017 03 13T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/VCT/CO/2 3 Convention on the Distr.: General 13 March 2017 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the UHRICRC/C/VCT/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c5227570-4e41-40e4-a643-22b4be068a1a
SAKSKOBURGGOTSKI AND CHROBOK v. Bulgaria
SAKSKOBURGGOTSKI AND CHROBOK v. Bulgaria BGR 28/02/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate ban on any commercial use of forestland allegedly acquired through restitution by the applicants the former King EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59875
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan AZE 16/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: The case concerns a refugee of Armenian origin who was forced to flee from his home during the active military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict 1992 94 . In EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1717
SENEGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SENEGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/SEN/CO/5 NULL 2019 12 11T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/SEN/CO/5 International Covenant on Distr.: General 11 December 2019 Civil and Political Rights English Original: French Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/SEN/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9303ca3f-bc2e-4e18-a5c3-e3043e8402c2