Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1281 - 1297 of 1297
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/41/43/Add.1 from 26 March 2018 to 4 April 2018 21 May 2019 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Thailand United Nations A/HRC/41/43/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: UNSPA/HRC/41/43/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f41%2f43%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.2 from 4 April 2009 to 9 April 2009 14 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Afghanistan United Nations UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.1 from 1 July 2015 to 8 July 2015 2 August 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Tunisia United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.2 from 12 October 2015 to 16 October 2015 8 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Belgium United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 from 18 February 2013 to 22 February 2013 5 August 2013 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras United UNSPA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f24%2f45%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.3 from 14 March 2016 to 18 March 2016 29 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Ukraine United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/36/47/Add.1 from 10 October 2016 to 19 October 2016 12 September 2017 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Central African UNSPA/HRC/36/47/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f47%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X. v. Switzerland
X. v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/470/2011 Communication number s : 470/2011 Author: X. represented by counsel Monique Bremi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Jul 2011 Date of decision 24 Nov 2014 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/470/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2040/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/512/2012 Communication number s : 512/2012 Author: Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 06 Jan 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/55/D/512/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1980/en-US
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/698/2015 Communication number s : 698/2015 Author: Z.K. and A.K. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Aug 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/698/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2722/en-US
Z.W. v. Australia
Z.W. v. Australia CAT/C/62/D/669/2015 Communication number s : 669/2015 Author: Z.W. represented by counsel Frances Milne Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Australia Submission date 20 Mar 2015 Date of decision 28 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/669/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2413/en-US
Zhanna Baytelova v. Kazakhstan
Zhanna Baytelova v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/129/D/2520/2015 Communication number s : 2520/2015 Author: Zhanna Baytelova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2015 Date of decision 22 Jul 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2520/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2859/en-US
Ziablitsev v. France
Ziablitsev v. France E/C.12/71/D/176/2020 Communication number s : 176/2020 Author: Sergei Ziablitsev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country France Submission date 06 Jan 2020 Date of decision 02 Mar 2022 Comment: This document JUTBE/C.12/71/D/176/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3000/en-US